GI SPECIAL 4B10:
THIS IS HOW
BUSH BRINGS THE TROOPS HOME:
BRING THEM
ALL HOME NOW

The casket of Marine Staff
Sgt. Kenneth Pospisil during burial Friday, Dec. 23, 2005 in
Anoka, Minn. Pospisil was killed when a bomb went off near
Al Ramadi in Iraq Dec. 14. Pospisil was the 31st Minnesotan
to die in connection with the Iraq war. (AP Photo/Jim Mone)
“I Know
That The War Was Not Worth Fighting. “I Know, Because I
Fought There”
(An Open
Letter To Bubba)
[Will
Charlie Anderson be a lead speaker, with other Iraq
Veterans, at the Spring rallies against the war being
organized by UFPJ and ANSWER? Or will he and other veterans
be kicked to the curb again, and the Iraq Veterans Against
The War be used for so much window dressing again, but
denied the leading role again, as happened on 9.24 in
Washington DC? Stay tuned. T]
By Charlie
Anderson, Iraq Veterans Against the War.
Posted on the IVAW web site at:
www.ivaw.net
I’ve seen
you around. I’ve seen you driving your gas guzzling SUV
with the “Support Our Troops” ribbon on the back.
I’ve seen
you wearing your pro-war/pro-bush t-shirts as you walk right
past me in my Iraq Veterans Against the War t-shirt as if I
don’t exist.
And I’ve
seen you at anti-war rallies and meetings where I often
speak, as you wave your American flag and call me a
traitor.
In this
country we have freedom of speech. But you owe me and every
other veteran of this war the respect of listening to our
experience.
Your magnet says “support our
troops,” but what have you done for us?
You say that I am not
supporting the troops when I say that they should come home.
But I am, because I know that there was no threat to our
nation from Saddam Hussein, I know that had no weapons of
mass destruction, and I know that we were not welcomed in as
liberators.
I know that
the war was not worth fighting. I know, because I fought
there. You say I’m confused. But what do you know about
? You’ve never been there.
You have
the audacity to claim that by not supporting the president,
I don’t support the troops. Yet, the president chose to
send over 160,000 of us to unprepared and without a defined
mission.
We had no
body armor, no vehicle armor, and poor supplies of
ammunition.
Our
families spent thousands of dollars that they did not have
to supply us, while President Bush did nothing. In fact he
didn’t even scold his Offensive Secretary, Donald Rumsfeld,
when he told our forward deployed troops, “you go to war
with the army you have, not the army you wish you had.”
Moreover,
the mission was originally about weapons of mass
destruction, but there were none. Then it was making a
democracy, but yet the “insurgency” worsens. Now the
president has decided that in order to honor those who died
for nothing, more must die for nothing.
At present, 2,241 of my
brothers and sisters in arms have died. In some way, they
may be the lucky ones.
Over sixteen thousand others
have been wounded in this war, thousands more than planned.
The term
wounded sounds sterile, bland, and inoffensive. But, in
reality, many of them have been so horribly damaged that
medical science had to create a new word to describe their
wounds: polytrauma.
These people would have died
in earlier wars, but because of the gallant efforts of brave
doctors and medics, they get to live.
They get to
live with teams of ten or more doctors just trying to get
their broken, mangled bodies through another day, as their
families look on in horror.
They get to live in a physical
and emotional hell, not able to recover and not able to
voice the pain they feel or the psychological demons they
face. All the while suffering with a Veterans
Administration underfunded by nearly three billion dollars
and unable to care for them in the manner they deserve.
So which one of us supports
the troops?
You, who has never set foot in
Iraq and wants to leave my brothers and sisters there until
they complete whatever the undefined mission of the week is,
or me, the veteran of this war who has seen the carnage of
battle, the rampant indifference of my countrymen, and just
wants to bring my brothers and sisters home alive and care
for them when they get here?
Keep coming
to the rallies. Maybe I’ll get through your thick skull
eventually.
But
remember I waved my flag in Baghdad, so you can sit down,
shut up, and listen to me.
******************************************************
The IVAW
Mission Statement

Iraq Veterans Against the War
(IVAW) is a group of veterans who have served since
September 11th, 2001 including Operation Enduring Freedom
and Operation Iraqi Freedom.
We are committed to saving
lives and ending the violence in Iraq by an immediate
withdrawal of all occupying forces.
We also believe that the
governments that sponsored these wars are indebted to the
men and women who were forced to fight them and must give
their Soldiers, Marines, Sailors, and Airmen the benefits
that are owed to them upon their return home.
We welcome all active duty,
national guard, reservists, and recent veterans into our
ranks. Confidentiality can be assured. To join IVAW please
send an email to ivaw@ivaw.net.
Contact Information
IVAW
P.O. Box 8296
Philadelphia, PA 19101
Phone: 215-241-7123
E-mail: ivaw@ivaw.net
MORE:
“This Is
Not The First Time I Have Experienced This In The Peace
Movement”
From: Mike
Hastie
To: GI Special
Sent: October 11, 2005
Subject:
Passing Of The Baton
To G.I. Special:
I was at
the march in Washington, D.C. on September 24, 2005, and the
two days that followed.
I was also
disappointed that veterans did not have a stronger voice in
what happened during that historic gathering.
As a
veteran, this is not the first time I have experienced this
in the peace movement.
As far as I
am concerned, the most powerful and threatening voice in
America against the war in Iraq, are the Iraq veterans who
know this war to be a lie.
There is no
other anti-war group in America, that has this kind of
power.
As a
Vietnam veteran, it is time to pass the baton, and that
baton is the microphone.
I met
numerous Iraq Veterans in Washington, D.C. over that
weekend, and without exception, everyone of them can hold
their own.
They are as
bright and articulate as any veteran I have ever met, and
that includes Korean and WWII veterans. They are the next
generation of Veterans, who will blow the whistle on the
U.S. Government.
The more
they speak, the stronger they will become, and the end
result will be that more Iraq Veterans will come out of the
woodwork to join them. They know the war in Iraq like the
back of their hands.
And, the
only thing they need is a microphone in their hands.
The truth
they hold in their hearts, will be the truth that steps
forward to bear witness.
As a
Vietnam veteran, my job will be to help them find a venue to
speak. I would love to introduce them to the audience, and
then it is time for me to sit down. The rest will be
history.
Mike Hastie
Vietnam
Veteran
October 11,
2005
Do you
have a friend or relative in the service? Forward this
E-MAIL along, or send us the address if you wish and
we’ll send it regularly.
Whether in Iraq or stuck on a base in the USA, this is
extra important for your service friend, too often cut
off from access to encouraging news of growing
resistance to the war, at home and inside the armed
services.
Send requests to address up top.
IRAQ WAR
REPORTS
TWO MARINES
DIE FROM FALLUJA AREA IED
2/10/2006 HEADQUARTERS UNITED
STATES CENTRAL COMMAND NEWS RELEASE Number: 06-02-01C & KUNA
CAMP
FALLUJAH, Iraq: Two Marines assigned to 2nd Marine Division,
II Marine Expeditionary Force (Forward), died as a result of
wounds received when their patrol was attacked with an
improvised explosive device while conducting combat
operations near Fallujah, Feb. 9.
The
statement said the two soldiers were seriously wounded with
shrapnel of the explosion, and that the pair succumbed to
the critical injuries shortly after the deadly incident on
Thursday.
Kent Man
Wounded

Spc. Jay Strobino
February 10, 2006 By John
Pirro, STAFF WRITER, New Milford Spectrum
A 21-year-old soldier from
Kent will be back in the United States in a few days after
being wounded in a Jan. 31 firefight in Iraq, his parents
said this week.
Spc. Jay Christopher Strobino,
the son of Jay and Susan Strobino of Camp Flats Road,
sustained two bullet wounds when his 101st Airborne unit
came under fire.
He called his parents from a
Baghdad hospital Saturday night and told them he should be
transferred to Walter Reed Army Hospital in Washington,
D.C., later this week.
“He’s doing well, and he’s
coming back in a few days,” his mother told The News Times,
sister publication of The Spectrum, on Sunday afternoon.
“As soon as we get the word
he’s coming stateside, we’ll be there,” Mrs. Strobino said.
Spc. Strobino, a graduate of
Kent Center School and Housatonic Valley Regional High
School in Falls Village, enlisted in the Army shortly after
graduating from high school
Mrs. Strobino said the family
got the news in a phone call Saturday morning from a fellow
soldier who’d been with their son when he was wounded.
“[Jay] was alert and conscious
enough to tell his friend to call his parents before the
Army did,” she related.
Spc. Strobino was shot twice
and suffered a broken leg and a collapsed lung, according to
Mrs. Strobino.
“You try and prepare
yourself,” Mrs. Strobino said. “We understand the dangers,
but you never really are prepared for that.
“He was doing his job, and
with his job comes danger,” she commented. “Fortunately, he
will recover.”
Spc. Strobino called his
parents later on Saturday, and he sounded to be in good
spirits, Mrs. Strobino said.
The young soldier told his
family he would shortly be transferred to an Army hospital
in Germany and would probably be there a day or so before
coming back to the United States.
Mrs. Strobino said word about
their son spread quickly, and the family has received a
steady stream of calls from well-wishers.
“The support has been
monumental, from in town and out of town,” she related.
“People have really been there for us.”
“On Average
Every Camp Gets Hit With Three Mortar Rounds, Three To Six
Mortar Rounds Every Night”
9 February 2006 Reporter:
Hamish Fitzsimmons, PM [Excerpt]
Reporter:
Hamish Fitzsimmons, interviewing Malcom Nance, a former US
Navy officer who's spent 20 years in the intelligence
community and conducted anti-terrorism operations in
Afghanistan and Iraq.
Nance: But
the people who are actually carrying out the day to day
insurgency, on average 60 to 70 attacks per day of
improvised explosive devices and small weapons attacks,
those are the guys who are killing two American soldiers per
day.
And the
types of attacks they're doing besides the IEDs on the road
is, you know, shooting rockets into the camps at night, or
mortars: on average every camp gets hit with three mortar
rounds, three to six mortar rounds every night.
REALLY BAD
PLACE TO BE:
BRING THEM
ALL HOME NOW

A US military patrol inspects
the damage from a car bomb Feb. 3, 2006, in eastern Baghdad.
(AP Photo/Khalid Mohammed)
TROOP NEWS
FORUM:
America's
Military Today:
The
Challenge of
Militarism
Thursday,
February 16
7 PM
CUNY
Graduate Center
34th Street
and 5th Avenue Room 5414
New York,
New York
SPEAKERS:
Tod Ensign,
Executive Director of Citizen Soldier, author of America's
Military Today (New Press, 2005)
Job
Mashariki, Black Veterans for Social Justice
Jim Murphy,
Veterans for Peace
Jose
Vasquez, Iraq Veterans Against the War
SPONSORS
(in formation):
Citizen Soldier
Brooklyn Parents for Peace
Veterans for Peace
Iraq Veterans Against the War
Black Veterans for Social
Justice
Solidarity
Campus Anti-War Network
New York City Labor Against
the War
International Socialist
Organization
New Politics
Democratic Socialists of
America
Freedom Road Socialist
Organization
GI Special
The Military Project
Iraq
Veterans Against The War Member Tomas Young To Be Featured
On
“60
Minutes” Sunday Night
[Thanks to James Starowicz,
Veterans For Peace, who sent this in.]
This Sunday night February 12,
2006, CBS's "60 Minutes" will present a segment called
"Wounds of War" which their website describes this way:
"WOUNDS OF
WAR: Many of today's soldiers who are severely wounded in
combat are returning home thanks to body armor and improved
medicine. Several of them tell Mike Wallace their stories.
Robert Anderson is the producer."
Among those
who will be featured on this segment will be Tomas Young,
the son of MFSO Member Cathy Smith of Missouri. Tomas is
Cathy's eldest son; he served with the Army's 1st Cavalry
Division in Iraq. On April 4, 2004 he was struck by an
AK-47 round; he is now paralyzed from the chest down.
Tomas is a
member of Iraq Veterans Against the War.
Cathy Smith's middle son is
currently serving with the Army in Iraq.
Tomas has traveled the country
speaking out against the war and has been a powerful voice
for Iraq Veterans Against the War. His mom Cathy has been a
powerful voice for Military Families Speak Out.
If you get a chance, tune in
on Sunday night (check local listings for time). We look
forward to seeing how 60 Minutes will portray this very
important and too often un-told story.
In Peace and Solidarity,
Nancy Lessin and Charley
Richardson for Military Families Speak Out
www.mfso.org
www.bringthemhomenow.org
IRAQ
RESISTANCE ROUNDUP

(Graphic: London Financial Times)
ASSORTED
RESISTANCE ACTION
Feb 10 (KUNA) & Aljazeera &
Reuters
The Iraqi
security arena witnessed fresh violence over the past hours
with three government troops being killed and brother of a
member of the legislative council taken as hostage.
A security
source said on Friday that three members of the National
Guards were killed and two others were wounded in a bomb
blast that taregetted a military patrol in the district of
Al-Mshahedah in the capital, late on Thursday.
In a
separate blast, five members of the force were wounded in
Al-Ghazaliah area in the city.
Also late
on Thursday, guerrillas captured the brother of the member
of the Iraqi National Assembly, Rajaa Daoud, in the
capital's district of Al-Karradah. They
forced the man, named Adel, into their car at gunpoint
before speeding off.
A
policewoman, Nidthal Mohammad, was killed by gunmen wearing
Iraqi army uniforms who broke into her house in Baquba,
65 km (40 miles) north of Baghdad, police said.
Guerrillas
ambushed two policemen, killing one and wounding another as
they headed to work in Baquba, police said.
In a
separate incident, one Iraqi soldier was killed and another
was wounded when resistance fighters in a car opened fire on
them, police said.
IF YOU
DON’T LIKE THE RESISTANCE
END THE
OCCUPATION
FORWARD
OBSERVATIONS
One day
while I was in a bunker in Vietnam, a sniper round went
over my head. The person who fired that weapon was not
a terrorist, a rebel, an extremist, or a so-called
insurgent. The Vietnamese individual who tried to kill
me was a citizen of Vietnam, who did not want me in his
country. This truth escapes millions.
Mike Hastie
U.S. Army Medic
Vietnam
1970-71
December 13, 2004
BLINDING
FLASH OF THE OBVIOUS:
“If An
Elected Official Doesn't Call For An Immediate Withdrawal Of
The Troops, Then That Official Is Pro-War
[And
any candidate who does not call for an immediate
withdrawal of the troops is “Pro War” and any political
figure who supports the election of any candidate who
does not call for an immediate withdrawal of the troops
is “Pro War,” and that is not rocket science. Duh. T]
09 February 2006 By Cindy
Sheehan, Truthout Statement [Excerpts]
The last
Senate vote for increased funding for the killing was 99-0.
How about
cutting off the President's means for killing? It is not
that difficult.
It is not
"enough" to say that one is critical of the war in Iraq.
If an
elected official voted for the war, votes for the funding of
the war, and doesn't call for an immediate withdrawal of the
troops, then that official is "pro-war," no matter what he
or she says.
We in
America are fed up with rhetoric, and if the actions don't
match the rhetoric, then we are not buying what they are
selling anymore.
What do you think?
Comments from service men and women, and veterans, are
especially welcome. Send to
thomasfbarton@earthlink.net. Name, I.D., withheld on
request. Replies confidential.
Fascism
Comment: T
If we had a
fascist government, you would not be reading this.
The
argument that Bush and Co. are fascists is often used by
people who go on to say:
“So vote
for John Kerry or (fill in the blank). Yes, he may be
pissed Falluja hasn't been attacked already, and wants
40,000 more troops to go to Iraq, or (fill in the blank) but
at least he’s not one of those fascists! THEY HAVE TO BE
STOPPED, SO VOTE FOR THE DEMOCRATS!”
Of course,
if those in power really were fascists, there would be no
voting for Democrats.
What many
people have no grip on is that within a given capitalist
society, the political elite is quite capable of installing
bloody military or political dictatorships that have nothing
whatever to do with fascism. Blathering about fascism is
just a way some people deny the reality of what capitalism
is all about. Oh, if only some nice liberal politicians
could replace those mean old "fascist" politicians,
everything would be OK.
All this
yowling about fascism does carry a most terrible risk.
If the real
thing comes along, complete with semi-military mass
movements of the poor marching in the streets to beat the
shit out of anybody and everybody their paymasters tell them
to, which is how you know it's really fascism, then warnings
about it will be taken as just more rhetorical excess by
people who have been crying wolf for twenty years, thereby
making the job of mobilizing people to exterminate a fascist
movement by physical force in the streets more difficult.
Here’s some
news:
It wasn't
fascists that started the war against Mexico and grabbed
half their country; or took and held the Philippines, Cuba
and Puerto Rico in 1899; or invaded and occupied Vietnam; or
came up with the sanctions against Iraq that killed
millions.
It wasn't
fascists that sent Gene Debs and thousands of others to
prison for opposing World War l, put the Japanese in
concentration camps in World War II, or kept racist
segregation in place for 100 years after the Civil War. It
wasn't fascists who organized the killing of strikers at
Ludlow, Colorado, or ordered them massacred at Republic
Steel and elsewhere in the 1930's.
Just good
old free enterprise suits and their political and military
business associates.
The Chilean
dictator Pinochet in the 1970s is a classic example.
No, he was
not a fascist. He built no mass movements to kill those on
the left. He didn't have to. It was unnecessary. The left
never saw him coming. Although Chile was in a revolutionary
crisis, most of the left did not lift a finger to reach out
to the soldiers of Chile and try to win them over before
Pinochet could use them to slaughter anybody who opposed him
and destroy their movement: the same mistake the left makes
here, now.
General
Pinochet was just a good old fashioned traditional dictator
defending capitalism in Chile in a good old fashioned
traditional way: the mass murder of those opposed to
capitalism in Chile: forty-thousand executed is a
conservative estimate.
You don't
have to be a fascist to do that.
Guess
what. Military dictatorship is what capitalists reach for
when their class rule is threatened from below. The mask of
“democracy” comes off and they organize to slaughter people
opposed to them. In the overwhelming number of instances
this has happened down through history, "fascism" had
nothing to do with it.
And that's
the reality a lot of people run away from. Just like they
run away from reaching out to our troops today, who could
stop a reactionary movement, including one organized by
their own officers.
If people
think fascism could be coming, but won't reach out to our
troops today, who could protect us in a crisis, one must
conclude they wish to Bring It On, however much heavy
breathing and sweaty pointing with alarm about it they do.
OCCUPATION
REPORT
U.S.
OCCUPATION RECRUITING DRIVE IN HIGH GEAR;
RECRUITING
FOR THE ARMED RESISTANCE THAT IS

U.S. Marines with the 22nd
Marine Expeditionary Unit (MEU) detain a group of Iraqi
citizens near the western Iraq city of Hit, February 3,
2006. REUTERS/Bob Strong
[Fair is
fair. Let’s bring 150,000 Iraqis over here to the USA.
They can kill people at checkpoints, bust into their houses
with force and violence, overthrow the government, put a new
one in office they like better and call it “sovereign,” and
“detain” anybody who doesn’t like it in some prison without
any charges being filed against them, or any trial.]
[Those
Iraqis are sure a bunch of backward primitives. They
actually resent this help, have the absurd notion that it’s
bad their country is occupied by a foreign military
dictatorship, and consider it their patriotic duty to fight
and kill the soldiers sent to grab their country. What a
bunch of silly people. How fortunate they are to live under
a military dictatorship run by George Bush. Why, how could
anybody not love that? You’d want that in your home town,
right?]
More
Civilians Killed By Occupation Troops
Feb 10, 2006 Baghdad (dpa )
Two Iraqi civilians were
killed on Friday by US military gunfire following an attack
on the latter's patrol in al- Karma village in the vicinity
of Fallujah, 70 kilometres west of Baghdad, a police source
said.
Ahmed
Mahawesh, an Iraqi policeman, told Deutsche Presse-Agentur
dpa the random bullets fired by American soldiers killed an
elderly man and a 17-year-old driving in a civilian car
after an army patrol vehicle was set ablaze in attack by
gunmen.
OCCUPATION ISN’T LIBERATION
BRING
ALL THE TROOPS HOME NOW!
“The Scale
And Intensity Of The Corruption And Fraud Perpetrated By The
Occupation Is Unprecedented In Modern History”
February 9, 2006 By Dave
Whyte, Socialist Worker (UK) [Excerpts]
The
looting of Iraq’s oil wealth is unprecedented in the history
of corporate crime, writes criminologist Dave Whyte. Dave
Whyte is a lecturer in criminology at the University of
Stirling.
The neo-liberal transformation
of Iraq is portrayed as a humanitarian venture. Western
corporations and occupying governments now talk of the
liberation of Iraq from the "tyranny of Saddam’s planned
economy".
On the day that major
hostilities were declared over, Tony Blair told the Iraqi
people, "Saddam Hussein and his regime plundered your
nation’s wealth. While many of you live in poverty, they
have the lives of luxury. The money from Iraqi oil will be
yours, to be used to build prosperity for you and your
families."
This has turned out to be
another shameless lie.
Saddam’s
regime was undoubtedly corrupt, in the sense that he
established a system of patronage and rewards for the elite
that remained closest to him. But the scale and intensity
of the corruption and fraud perpetrated by the occupation is
unprecedented in modern history.
The largest
part of the money spent by the US-British occupation was not
US or international donor funds, but oil revenue that
belongs to the Iraqi people. During the period of direct
rule the US spent, or committed to spend, around £11.3
billion, most of which was disbursed to US corporations.
Of this
expenditure, £5 billion is unaccounted for.
From the available evidence we
know that much of it has vanished into the hands of
corporations, corrupt public officials and elite Iraqi deal
fixers.
During 14 months of its
existence the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA), the
body set up to rule Iraq and headed up by Bush favourite
Paul Bremer, issued 100 legal orders by decree.
The explicit aim was to
promote fast entry into Iraq’s oil rich economy.
CPA Order
12, implemented a month after George Bush declared major
hostilities over, suspended customs and duty charges on
goods entering the country.
Within a
few days of the order being passed, mass produced chicken
legs were dumped on the Iraqi economy by US companies,
forcing the market price of chicken down to 71p a kilogram,
below the cheapest price that Iraqi producers could sustain.
Those
chicken legs were surplus to the US market because the
average American prefers breast meat. Before the invasion,
those chicken legs would have most likely been sold as pet
food.
The biggest scandal involves
reconstruction contracts.
In one period between 2003 and
2004, more than 80 percent of prime contracts were given to
US firms, with the remainder split between British,
Australian, Italian, Israeli, Jordanian and Iraqi firms.
One source estimates the total received by Iraqi firms
during the CPA’s rule at around 2 percent.
The CPA managed to concentrate
funds in the hands of US firms by issuing non-competitive
bids. From records of expenditure we can estimate that
around 66 percent of contracts between April 2003 and April
2004 were issued non-competitively to hand-picked favourite
companies.
The restructuring of the Iraqi
economy is best characterised as a "smash and grab"
operation.
The "smash"
involved the imposition of a set of administrative
instruments which established US and other western
contractors as the prime agents of reconstruction thus
marginalising and undermining Iraqi capital.
The
appropriation (the "grab") of Iraq’s oil wealth ensured that
the rapid entry of foreign capital was underwritten by Iraqi
revenue. It has been executed with a guarantee of immunity.
On the same
day that the CPA came into being, Bush signed Executive
Order 13303 which exempted the Development Fund for Iraq
(DFI), the agency set up to distribute reconstruction
contracts, from all legal proceedings and judicial
oversight. The order effectively granted the CPA immunity
from prosecution and judicial interference.
The CPA
kept no list of companies it issued contracts to, and it had
no system for metering the oil that it exported and sold.
Officials were authorised to disperse revenue with little or
no adequate system of monitoring or accounting.
Very
deliberately the US delayed the establishment of
auditing bodies and then refused to cooperate with their
inquiries.
A full
11 months after the CPA took control of the Iraqi
economy, they appointed Stuart Bowden, a close associate
of Bush, to audit the authority. Bowden served Bush in
the Texas governor’s office in the early 1990s and
latterly as a White House official.
Despite the fact that the dice
was loaded in favour of the CPA, the US and UN audit reports
that eventually appeared still read like a textbook of
corporate accounting fraud.
Iraqi oil revenue was flown in
to the CPA in $100 dollar bills, shrink wrapped in $100,000
(£57,000) bundles of "cash bricks". One CPA official has
described how cash was distributed to contractors from the
back of a lorry.
The use of
cash payments enabled the CPA to distribute the
reconstruction funds without leaving a paper trail.
One review
found that a payment made by the CPA to the Kurdish regional
government for £794 million was entered under the budget
heading "transfer payments".
The Kurdish
authorities insisted that the money was not spent but could
not provide any evidence to support this. It was widely
reported that this payment was delivered by Blackhawk
helicopters to a courier in the Kurdish city of Erbil who
subsequently disappeared.
Apparently
no one even bothered to record the courier’s name.
One audit
found 37 contracts totalling more than £105 million for
which no contracting files could be located. It noted a
case where an unauthorised advance of almost £1.7 million
was paid out by a CPA senior advisor, and a case in which
the CPA appointed head of the ministry of health could not
account for £346,000 worth of spending under his direct
control.
A total of £5 billion of
Development Fund for Iraq funds cannot be properly accounted
for.
Iraqi
business people report that they had to pay "middle men"
substantial bribes even to be allowed to bid for contracts.
The routine kickbacks and
bribes demanded by the CPA officials fuelled a culture of
corporate corruption.
In one of the most reported
cases, the private military firm Custer Battles collected
£8.5 million to provide security for Iraq’s civilian
airline.
Custer Battles was one of
hundreds of firms that were set up specifically to get a
slice of the war spoils. This company was established by
Mike Battle and Scott Custer, reputedly a descendant of
general George Custer of Little Big Horn fame.
One CPA official giving
evidence to a US senate committee, told Custer Battles to
"bring a bag" to pick up their cash.
He produced a picture of two
company officials smiling to the camera as they loaded up
duffel bags with over £1.1 million of Iraqi oil money.
Custer Battles never did the
job they were contracted for, but ran off with the cash,
using it instead to set up barrack accommodation for cheap
imported labourers that they hired out to other Western
firms.
Over-charging was routine in
reconstruction contracts.
An audit of Kellogg, Brown and
Root’s (KRB) contract to restore Iraqi oil fields found £61
million in "unresolved costs" (spending that had not been
properly accounted for).
In one
incident KBR charged the US army more than £15.3 million for
transporting £46,500 worth of fuel from Kuwait.
The firm implicated in the Abu
Ghraib tortures, CACI International, was accused by the US
General Accounting Office of billing for inflated employee
hours and falsely upgrading job descriptions to inflate the
wage bill.
Ghost
armies of employees are everywhere in Iraq and payrolls are
inflated as a matter of routine.
Institutionalised corruption
in occupied Iraq has been, purely and simply, a technique of
neo-liberal domination.
The
economic occupation has used fraud and corruption to
underwrite the economic occupation in precisely the same way
that torture and assassination have been used to perpetuate
the military occupation.
The
invasion of Iraq was a brutal act of criminal violence on
the part of Bush and Blair.
This war
crime has been sustained by the systematic economic
criminality of the occupying governments and their
corporations.
The largest part of the
billions of dollars in reconstruction funds were disbursed
to the US prime contractors.
The prime contractors include
Kellogg, Brown and Root (a subsidiary of Halliburton),
Parsons Delaware, Fluor Corporation, Washington Group,
Bechtel Group, Contrack International, Louis Berger and
Perini.
The prime contractors act as
"gatekeepers", controlling entry into the Iraqi market.
Almost all
of the foreign delegates at the Rebuild Iraq 2005 conference
held in Jordan were doing business with US prime contractors
rather than with Iraqi firms.
According
to the British delegations, not one deal was tied up with an
Iraqi business over the four days.
When
William Lash, the US undersecretary of state for commerce,
finished his presentation to the 2005 conference, he was
confronted by Assad al-Khudhairi, the head of the Iraqi
Contractors Federation.
Al-Khudhairi castigated the occupation for the damage done
to the economy and complained that "product dumping" had
forced 25,000 local businesses to the wall.
OCCUPATION
PALESTINE
New
Basketball Rules In The Middle East
8 February 2006 Yasser Jordan,
BNN's Sports Editor [Excerpts]
The International Basketball
Federation (FIBA) has directed its Middle East commission to
implement fifteen new rule changes from March 1.
The statement said rule
changes proposed by the Technical Commission in December
2005 were accepted by FIBA Central Board.
Following are the rule
changes:
Rule 1: Israelis have the
right to play on both sides of the court, whereas
Palestinians can only play on their own side.
Rule 2: For security reasons
Palestinians do not have the right to pass the ball between
players, the ball could hit an Israeli player.
Rule 3: There will be no
basket on the Israeli side.
Rule 4: Israel is allowed to
shoot at any time even during time-outs.
Rule 5: Palestinians are not
allowed to have supporters. Only Israelis should be
supported.
Rule 6: Israel selects the
sports press writers and what they report:
Rule 7: Israel encourages
Palestinians to shoot into the Palestinian basket. Players
who refuse will be nominated as terrorists and will not be
allowed to play.
Rule 8: Palestinian players
are allowed to leave the field, but cannot return. One
exception: A Palestinian can be replaced by an Israeli.
Rule 9: Israel selects and
instructs the referees, and tells them when to look away.
Rule 10: Israel selects the
captain of the Palestinian team.
Rule 11: Israeli faults and
Palestinian good plays will not be shown on TV.
Rule 12: Israel takes the
money which sponsors pay to Palestinians clubs.
Rule 13: Only Israeli players
get refreshments.
Rule 14: Palestinians are
required to play, when and where designated by Israel.
Rule 15: Rules only apply to
Palestinians. Israelis may change the rules during the game
and are not required to advise the Palestinians of the
changes.
Israel
Plans To Build ‘Museum Of Tolerance’ On Muslim Graves
[Thanks to Michelle, Veterans
For Peace]
09 February 2006 By Donald
Macintyre in Jerusalem, Independent News and Media Limited
Skeletons
are being removed from the site of an ancient Muslim
cemetery in Jerusalem to make way for a $150m (£86m) "museum
of tolerance" being built for the Los Angeles-based Simon
Wiesenthal Centre.
Palestinians have launched a legal battle to stop the work
at what was the city's main Muslim cemetery. The work is to
prepare for the construction of a museum which seeks the
promotion of "unity and respect among Jews and between
people of all faiths".
Israeli
archaeologists and developers have continued excavating the
remains of people buried at the site, which was a cemetery
for at least 1,000 years, despite a temporary ban on work
granted by the Islamic Court, a division of Israel's justice
system.
Police have been taking legal
advice on whether the order is legally binding. The Israeli
High Court is to hear a separate case brought by the Al Aqsa
Association of the Islamic Movement in Israel next week.
The project, which a spokesman
said had been conceived in partnership with the Jerusalem
municipality and the Israeli government, was launched at a
ceremony in 2004 by a cast of dignitaries ranging from Ehud
Olmert, who is currently the acting Prime Minister, to the
governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger.
The Israeli branch of the
Simon Wiesenthal Centre declined to comment yesterday and
has had no role in the project.
Durragham
Saif, the lawyer who brought the Islamic Court petition on
behalf of three Palestinian families, Al Dijani, Nusseibeh
and Bader Elzain, all of whom have members buried at the
cemetery, said: "It's unbelievable, it's immoral. You cannot
build a museum of tolerance on the graves of other people.
“Imagine this kind of thing in
the States or England. And this is the Middle East where
events are sensitive. If this goes ahead in this way it is
going to cause the opposite thing to tolerance."
Mr Saif
said he had written to the Israeli State Attorney, Menachem
Mazuz, seeking police enforcement of the original order. He
said on a visit to the site he had entered three out of five
tents where excavations were being carried out. "I was
shocked to see open graves and tens of whole skeletons
there," he said.
Ikrema Sabri, the Mufti of
Jerusalem, demanded a halt to the excavations and said the
Muslim religious authorities had not been consulted on the
dig. Saying that the cemetery was in use for 15 centuries
and that friends of the Prophet Mohamed were buried there,
the Mufti declared: "There should be a complete cessation of
work on the cemetery because it is sacred for Muslims."
Osnat Goaz, a spokeswoman for
the Israel Antiquities Authority, which is carrying out the
excavations, said it was common in Jerusalem to build on
cemeteries. Adding that in such cases the bones were
reburied, she said: "Israel is more crowded with ancient
artefacts than any other country in the world. If we didn't
build on former cemeteries, we would never build."
[To check
out what life is like under a murderous military occupation
by a foreign power, go to:
www.rafahtoday.org The foreign army is Israeli; the
occupied nation is Palestine.]
DANGER:
POLITICIANS AT WORK

[Thanks to David Honish, Veterans For Peace, for sending in.
Falluja And
New Orleans:
Bush Scores
Two For Two
09 February 2006 By Linton
Weeks, The Washington Post
In the air there is a scent of
temporariness. Gone is the putrid aroma of post-Katrina mud
and sludge, yet the sour stench of stale French Quarter
libations has not fully returned. On the calendar, the city
sits at a midway point between hurricane seasons.
With calliope music blaring
from a tour boat on the nearby Mississippi River, ticket
seller Suzi Cobb, 59, provided a tragicomic description of
the puzzling purgatory that post-Katrina New Orleans has
become: "We're caught in a circle."
Tourists aren't coming to New Orleans, she explained,
because they can't find a place to stay. They can't
find a place to stay because the hotels are full of
federal relief workers, construction crews and evacuees,
many of whom have no homes. Evacuees who do still have
houses can't begin to fix them up because they have no
jobs or income. And until they get out of the hotels so
that tourists will have a place to stay, Cobb said,
there will be no tourists and therefore no jobs for the
workers.
There are
so many symbols of Limbo Land: Vast sections of the city are
still without utilities.
Without
electricity, businesses can't open their doors; without open
businesses, electric bills can't be paid.
Of an estimated 50 million
cubic yards of hurricane and flood debris, about 6 million
has been picked up, the city's Web site reported.
Countless cars litter the
landscape, rendered useless by the floodwaters.
Ridership
on buses and streetcars operated by the Regional Transit
Authority has fallen from 855,000 rides per week before
Katrina to 60,000 or fewer, according to a mid-January
situation report by the Bring New Orleans Back commission.
Only 17 of
122 public schools have reopened.
And 11,000
of 15,000 people working in the city's cultural positions
lost their jobs, the commission noted. Without musicians
and chefs, there will be no traditional music and food;
without music and food, there will be no distinctively New
Orleans culture.
Harry Anderson, magician and
former star of sitcoms "Night Court" and "Dave's World,"
also lives in Limbo Land. Anderson opened a speakeasy,
Oswald's, in May 2005. Crowds were flowing in, and so was
the money. He was really looking forward to the Labor Day
weekend. Then Katrina hit. Now Oswald's is dark most
nights because there are just not enough tourists for his
original scheme. "We are bleeding cash," Anderson said.
The city is
anything but the Big Easy, he said. It is small and
struggling.
"Nobody is doing any
business," said Charles Nelson, a commercial-transactions
lawyer. "We don't have a lot of commerce." Nelson has an
office in the Central Business District. But clients are
not able to come and go freely. And without clients, a
lawyer has a tough time.
HEAVEN OR
HELL: DUBYA CHOOSES
[Thanks to C for sending in.]
While walking down the street
one day, George "Dubya" Bush is shot by a disgruntled NRA
member. His soul arrives in heaven and he is met by St.
Peter at the Pearly Gates.
"Welcome to heaven," says St.
Peter. "Before you settle in, it seems there is a problem: