GI SPECIAL 4B14:
Free Sgt.
Kevin Benderman

[www.geocities.com]g]
Feb. 12, 2006 By Katherine
Tam, The Olympian
FORT LEWIS:
About two dozen activists, including eight from Olympia,
called Saturday for the release of a soldier imprisoned here
for refusing to deploy to Iraq a second time.
The
activists held a banner that read “Free Kevin Benderman from
Fort Lewis Brig” over the Interstate 5 overpass at DuPont
near the military installation while drivers honked from
below.
“He served in the military
very faithfully and went to Iraq,” said Wally Cuddeford, who
was in the Navy for a year and a half. “The military,
instead of honoring the service he has given to his country,
is locking him up.”
Benderman was deployed to Iraq
from March to September 2003. He filed for conscientious
objector status in late 2004; his application was denied.
Conscientious objectors are morally opposed to war.
Benderman was to leave for
Iraq again in January 2005, but he refused. He was charged
with desertion and intentionally missing movement for not
boarding the plane for Iraq when his unit left. He was found
guilty of the second, lesser charge and sentenced last
summer to 15 months in prison. He is serving that sentence
at Fort Lewis.
Many activists at Saturday’s
vigil said they have never met Benderman, but they support
his right to be a conscientious objector.
The group included veterans
and those who have never been in war all from Seattle,
Olympia and Tacoma.
“I feel it’s a crime to
imprison him for doing what his conscience dictates,” said
Alice Zillah of Olympia.
“You don’t have to kill
someone to be a hero,” added Phan Nguyen, also of Olympia.
“A conscientious objector is a hero, and I support people
who risk their careers to do what’s right.”
At least three people did not share those
sentiments and came to the overpass to hold a counter-rally.
“It’s a disgrace,” Shelley
Weber of Olympia said as she waved a large American flag.
“I rally here every Saturday and, upon arrival, I see these
people on the bridge. I decorated this bridge. I bought
the yellow ribbons and flowers.”
“This is
the weekend our troops come in for drill. Their protest
demoralizes our troops,” added Terry
Harder, whose 23- and 26-year-old sons are in the military.
Harder is a member of Operation Support Our Troops.
[Let’s see. People who want
the troops to come home now alive, and with their body
parts, are demoralizing them, but Harder, who wants his own
kids to stay neck deep in the shit and fight Bush’s
unwinable Imperial war for oil, is good for morale. So, if
he really believes it, why doesn’t he take his worthless
self straight to Iraq. He doesn’t even have to be in the
armed forces. He can show his courage and patriotism by
taking a plane, crossing the border, buying an AK, and
fighting the bad guys. Unless he’s the cowardly type, who
would rather sit safely at home while his own sons do the
dying for him.]
Meanwhile, the two sides
exchanged words.
“Do you
know who Kevin Benderman is?” an activist said.
“I couldn’t
care less,” Weber said, while another man
added, “Kevin’s where he belongs.”
MORE:
Lietta Ruger writes:
email from Monica Benderman:
see their websites; www.BendermanTimeline.com
Thank you.
Kevin
called last night and let me know that more than one MP told
him about the vigil.
You know,
military families are going to present a different view to
the public than what the soldiers present in private.
We have
heard from over 600 soldiers in the past year who are trying
to find the courage to take their own personal stand.
We are doing everything we can to show
them that they can succeed, if it is done with dignity and
respect for differing views.
The worst
fear of the soldiers is the public negativity and
divisiveness. If we can show that the soldiers do matter,
that their choice should come first, there will be many more
that will cross the line.
We
appreciate this.
Monica and
Kevin

[Photo via Lietta Ruger]
Do you
have a friend or relative in the service? Forward this
E-MAIL along, or send us the address if you wish and
we’ll send it regularly.
Whether in Iraq or stuck on a base in the USA, this is
extra important for your service friend, too often cut
off from access to encouraging news of growing
resistance to the war, at home and inside the armed
services.
Send requests to address up top.
IRAQ WAR
REPORTS
Marine
Killed, Six Troops Wounded In Two Baghdad Area IED Attacks
2.14.06 By DPA & By SINAN
SALAHEDDIN, The Associated Press
A roadside bomb killed a U.S.
Marine in western Baghdad on Tuesday in one of two attacks
that also wounded six coalition military personnel, the
military said.
Eyewitnesses in Abu Ghraib
said that the roadside bomb at Abu Ghraib had targeted a US
military patrol made up of six vehicles.
The attack that killed the
Marine happened at about 10:30 a.m. near Abu Ghraib, the
military said in statement. Two other coalition personnel
were wounded in the attack that also damaged their vehicle.
He said that he did not have information about the
nationalities of the casualties.
About an hour later, another
coalition convoy was attacked by a roadside bomb and
small-arms fire in the Baghdad's Salaam area.
Six wounded
soldiers were removed from one of the vehicles, eyewitnesses
said, adding that one of the vehicles was destroyed and
another set ablaze.
U.S.
Casualties Reported From Husayba Car Bomb
Feb. 14 (Xinhuanet)
A roadside
bomb hit a U.S. patrol in the Husayba al-Sharqiyah, a town
in eastern Ramadi, some 110 km west of Baghdad, local
residents told Xinhua on condition of anonymity.
The attack
also destroyed a U.S. Humvee, killing or wounding all the
soldiers aboard, they said.
The U.S. troops revenged and
opened fire randomly after the attack causing unknown number
of casualties, the residents said.
A U.S. helicopter landed at
the site of the attack to evacuate American casualties, they
said.
Car Bomb
Hits US Military Patrol In Fallujah
Feb. 14 (Xinhuanet)
"A powerful
blast caused by a car bomb struck a U.S. military patrol on
the highway to the west of Fallujah, destroying a U.S.
Humvee," the witnesses, who refused to be named, told
Xinhua.
They said
it was not clear whether there was any casualties among U.S.
soldiers, adding after the blast, the U.S. troops blocked
the highway for more than one hour, preventing people from
approaching the scene.
REALLY BAD
PLACE TO BE:
BRING THEM
ALL HOME NOW!

2.9.06: A US soldier in a
building in the Hateen weapons compound in the town of
Hsawa, south of Baghdad. (AFP/US Army)
AFGHANISTAN
WAR REPORTS
“We Will
Kill To Protect The Honor Of Our Women And Children”
Government authority hardly extends beyond Kabul, and
what little had been established is quickly eroding.
Many believe the Taliban are clearly on the ascendancy
and that some territories are again reverting to its
control.
February 8 2006 by Curt
Goering, Amnesty International USA [Excerpts]
During the recent meeting of
the Afghani legislature, Vice President Dick Cheney and
Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld toured the country making
upbeat assessments about Afghanistan's transformation into a
peaceful and stable democracy.
But during a recent Amnesty
International mission in which I interviewed scores of
Afghans, including prisoners released from U.S. detention
centers, discovered the reality is considerably more
complicated and claims of success are greatly exaggerated.
Government
authority hardly extends beyond Kabul, and what little had
been established is quickly eroding. Many believe the
Taliban are clearly on the ascendancy and that some
territories are again reverting to its control.
Yet the patience of many
Afghans with the U.S. presence is wearing thin.
We heard
repeated accounts of aggressive tactics during raids on
homes or shops, particularly by U.S. troops in the southern
and eastern provinces, and of torture and ill-treatment in
U.S. custody. The complaints included beatings, sleep
deprivation, hooding, and being stripped naked.
Some of the most serious
allegations concerned treatment in detention cells at U.S.
Forward Operating Bases, where detainees are initially held
after arrest before transfer to Bagram, the U.S. airbase
where at least eight Afghans have died in U.S. custody.
We took scores of testimonies
from individuals who alleged wanton destruction or theft
during raids.
We also heard tales of males
being humiliated by, among other things, being forced to
kneel on the ground with heads bowed while being blindfolded
and handcuffed, sometimes hooded, in the presence of their
families before being taken away for interrogation.
We heard
numerous accounts of deeply offensive behavior toward women
by U.S. forces, such as ransacking women's belongings and
verbal abuse during weapons searches. "We will kill to
protect the honor of our women and children," said one
released detainee whose family had allegedly endured such
treatment.
We were
also assured that the United States is committed to
investigating allegations of abuse and to holding those
responsible accountable. Yet we heard dozens of complaints
about poor investigations into abusive treatment or property
destruction, in which those responsible for abuse were
merely slapped on the wrist.
Afghans
Have Had Enough Of Occupation “Dogwashers”
2.14.06 Christian Science
Monitor
The cartoon
protests of the past week, which have been the deadliest in
the Islamic world, are largely a barometer of domestic
frustrations, with protesters turning their anger on the
U.S., the West and the "dogwashers," a derisive term for
expatriate Afghan technocrats who have returned to top posts
in the government.
TROOP NEWS
War Is Good
Business:
Invest Your
Son Or Daughter
2.14.06 Tim Grieve, Salon.com
From a short item inside the
Times' business section Sunday:
"No matter
how one feels about this particular conflict, war always has
winners and losers, on both sides."
Some
"indisputable winners" so far?
Defense
contractors.
Courtesy of
the Times, here are six top defense contractors and the
percentages by which their profits have increased since
2004: Boeing (37.4 percent), Lockheed Martin (44.2 percent),
General Dynamics (19.1 percent), Northrop Grumman (29.2
percent), Raytheon (108.9 percent) and Halliburton (292.9
percent).
THIS IS HOW
BUSH BRINGS THE TROOPS HOME:
BRING THEM
ALL HOME NOW

Cynthia Garcia left, mother of
U.S. Army Chief Warrant Officer Ruel Garcia, and his wife
Apple Garcia during his funeral Feb. 7, 2006 in a cemetery
in Obando town, north of Manila. Warrant Officer Garcia, a
pilot of the U.S. Army 4th Aviation Regiment, Aviation
Brigade, 4th Infantry Division was killed in Taji, Iraq
while on mission. (AP Photo/Pat Roque)
70% Don’t
Want Attack On Iran Now
2.14.06 USA Today
Nearly
seven out of ten Americans surveyed worry that the U.S. may
move prematurely to use force against Iran's nuclear
facilities.
Pentagon’s
Stupid “Don’t Ask” Anti-Gay Policy Cost Taxpayers $363
Million
February 14, 2006 By Liz
Sidoti, Associated Press
Discharging
troops under the Pentagon’s policy on gays cost $363.8
million over 10 years, almost double what the government
concluded a year ago, a private report says.
The report,
to be released Tuesday by a University of California Blue
Ribbon Commission, questioned the methodology the Government
Accountability Office used when it estimated that the
financial impact of the “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” policy was
at least $190.5 million.
“It builds on the previous
findings and paints a more complete picture of the costs,”
said Rep. Marty Meehan, D-Mass., who has proposed
legislation that would repeal the policy.
The university study said the
GAO erred by emphasizing the expense of replacing those who
were discharged because of the policy without taking into
account the value the military lost from the departures.
So, the commission focused on
the estimated value the military lost from each person
discharged. The report detailed costs of $79.3 million for
recruiting enlisted service members, $252.4 million for
training them, $17.8 million for training officers and $14.3
million for “separation travel” once a service member is
discharged.
Idiots In Action:
Pentagon
Singles Out Schools As Security Threats:
Spying
Helps Build Support For Anti-War Group
He said
since MSNBC released information about the Pentagon's
list, the student group has received increasing support
on campus, even from those who do not completely agree
with the group's philosophy.
01/24/2006 The Daily Free
Press (Boston U.)
According
to the Pentagon, several universities in the U.S. may pose a
danger to national security.
On-campus
protests against military recruitment landed eight national
universities, including New York University and University
of California-Berkeley, on a Pentagon watch list for being
threats to national security.
In mid-December, MSNBC
released the list from the Department of Defense database
that cited various domestic "threats," including the college
campus demonstrations.
The list, which was part of a
400-page document, recorded more than 1,500 domestic
occurrences over the past 10 months, ranking them as either
"credible" or "not credible".
According to the document, all
of the campus protests were aimed at campus recruiters and
were held at the New York University, the State University
of New York at Albany, Southern Connecticut State
University, City College of the City University of New York,
UC-Berkeley and UC-Santa Cruz, an unspecified campus of the
University of Wisconsin and "a New Jersey university."
"We were surprised, to say the
least, that our university was on the list," said Josh
Taylor, a New York University spokesperson. "We were a bit
concerned, understandably, because we are not entirely clear
how we wound up on it."
NYU protesters' opposition to
the Solomon Amendment and various campuses anti-war
demonstrations are two of many global activities that the
Pentagon monitors in the name of national security,
according to a Pentagon Spokesperson.
"This
counterterrorism and surveillance are across the board,"
said a Pentagon spokesperson. "This is not just about
antiwar protests and it is not targeted against one type of
threat, this is a broad issue."
Compiled by the Pentagon's
Counterintelligence Field Activity, the record contains
"dots of information" provided by worldwide law enforcers,
intelligence groups, security agencies and citizens who
report "suspicious activity," the spokesman said. "These
dots are put in to try to 'connect the dots' before another
major terrorist attack occurs."
The only
university to be deemed as a "credible" threat in the
expansive DoD document was the UCSC.
The
targeted event, a non-violent Students Against War protest
at UCSC, was held on April 5 and drew more than 250 students
and some faculty who were opposed to military recruiting at
an on-campus college career fair.
"We hoped
that it would make a statement and to show that recruiters
weren't welcome on campus," said second year UCSC student
and participant Kot Hordynski. "We weren't thinking it
would be deemed a credible threat to national security."
Hordynski, who is from
Berkley, Calif., has been a member of Students Against War
campus group since it began in January of 2005. He said he
was disturbed but not surprised but the Pentagon's
surveillance.
"Honestly, when we learned
about that we were pretty astounded," Hordynski said. "What
we feel we do is just a demonstration of our first amendment
right and what we set out to do is non-violent."
He said
since MSNBC released information about the Pentagon's list,
the student group has received increasing support on campus,
even from those who do not completely agree with the group's
philosophy.
"We want to stick to our
message to end occupation abroad and to oppose recruitment
on campus," he said. "But we want to get the message out
that the government wastes their money -It's a complete
abomination that we should be spied on."
In one of the two official
statements released by UCSC Chancellor Denice Denton, she
said the University had not provided any federal agency with
information about the event in April and did not receive a
request for such information.
Denton's
letter was sent to all UCSC colleagues and stated that the
UCSC administration asked local Congress members to,
"request a definition of "credible threat;" to determine why
the April 5 demonstration was classified as one; to learn
how the information was gathered; and to address our concern
that future monitoring could have a chilling effect on the
exercise of free speech on our campus."
IRAQ
RESISTANCE ROUNDUP
Assorted
Resistance Action
Feb. 14 (AP) & Harriyet &
(KUNA) & MAKFAX & Aljazeera
A roadside
bomb blast at 8 a.m. struck a police patrol in southern
Baghdad's violent Dora neighborhood, wounding two policemen,
police said.
Another
police patrol was targeted at 8:40 a.m. near the University
of Technology in downtown Baghdad's Karradah district,
wounding one policeman, police said.
A Turkish
driver was injured in a rocket attack, while delivering
supplies to the US forces in Iraq, sources reported on
Monday. Huseyin, the driver of the truck, which was part of
a convoy of six Turkish trucks was delivering dry foodstuff
to US soldiers stationed in Baghdad.
Serious damages to the trucks
were also reported.
A police
source in Kirkuk told KUNA, armed militants in a red
pick-up, opened fire towards another car on Al-Abasiya road,
which led to the death of a policeman and the injury of two
civilians, who were later on transferred to a nearby
hospital.
At least
two Croat drivers have been reported missing when a convoy,
which included at least three Croatian trucks, came under
fire in Baghdad.
Zagreb's daily Vjesnik says
the assailants had fired grenades on the convoy near the US
base Anaconda north of Baghdad.
The owner of transport company
said the survivors have already contacted their families,
but they didn't know what happened with their colleagues.
The Anaconda base, US largest
support base in Iraq, is quite frequently a target of mortar
attacks by Iranian rebels.
An Iraqi
army major and his son were killed when they were fired on
by guerrillas in the Taji area north of Baghdad, U.S.
military said.
A police
colonel escaped an assassination attempt when insurgents
opened fire on his car while he was heading to work in
Baquba, police said. The colonel and his bodyguard were
wounded, police added.
An Iraqi
contractor working with the Iraqi army was killed by
resistance forces in Tikrit.
A police
colonel and one of his relatives were wounded when
resistance forces opened fire on them in the oil refinery
city of Baiji.
IF YOU
DON’T LIKE THE RESISTANCE
END THE
OCCUPATION
Basra Cuts
Off Relations With British
February 14, 2006 Guardian
Unlimited
The Basra
provincial council has suspended relations with the British
following new claims of abuse of Iraqis by UK troops,
British military officials said today.
Officials in Basra cut off
relations yesterday, a day after the News of the World
reported video footage showing British troops apparently
beating Iraqi civilians.
“It Is
Impossible Now To Be Friends With An Occupier”
February 12, 2006 By Anthony
Loyd, Palestine Chronicle
BAGHDAD: Although the footage
may be nearly two years old, the reaction of Iraqis to
scenes of British soldiers beating youths barely out of
childhood, and to the leering commentary of the cameraman,
was one of immediate outrage. It threatens an explosive
dispute at a vulnerable point in Britain’s troop deployment
in the Shia-dominated south of the country.
“I ask one question,” said
Hanan al-Tamimi, a leading figure of a women’s organization
in Basra, who was furious after watching the images on the
al-Jazeera television station. “Would British mothers accept
their sons being exposed to such brutality by cowardly
soldiers?"
Other Iraqis were even more
vitriolic. “It reflects exactly the real situation in
Iraq,” Muhanned Atta, a physician at al-Kadumiya hospital,
in Baghdad, said as he watched the footage with patients and
colleagues. “The beating happens behind walls. All the bad
things happen here behind walls.
“To our
faces the British and Americans try to look like perfect
liberators, but it’s a false image and this is the reality.
The British now look no different to those behind the Abu
Ghraib scandal.”
Although Iraqis are incensed
by the gratuitous beating inside the camp walls and the lack
of interest displayed by other soldiers who stroll past or
simply stare without intervening, they are just as angry at
the cameraman’s voice-over. He has repulsed Iraqis with his
leering, laughing and panting during the thrashing, and with
his mocking imitation of the teenagers’ cries for mercy.
“What does he think he’s doing, having sex?” asked one Iraq
man as he listened.
Whether an isolated incident
or part of a wider pattern, the troops’ behavior undermines
one of their commanders’ key aims: the establishment of law
and order. The sight of British soldiers "who are
responsible for training the police force" battering
teenagers to the floor inside their base erodes not only
their credibility but that of the forces they have spent so
long building up and educating.
“It reminds
me of the footage I used to watch as a child of Israelis
beating Palestinian kids,” Imad Jassim, an al-Kadumiya
doctor, said.
“It is
impossible now to be friends with an occupier. And people
ask why there is so much violence against the British and
Americans! Look at the video and you see the answer.”
OCCUPATION ISN’T LIBERATION
BRING
ALL THE TROOPS HOME NOW!
FORWARD
OBSERVATIONS
“Those
Recruiting Posters? Man, The Cooler That Shit Looks The
More It Sucks!”

THE
FREEDOM:
SHADOWS AND
HALLUCINATIONS IN OCCUPIED IRAQ
“Crawling through swamps. Sleeping in the mud, putting
paint on your face, all that Special Forces shit? I’ve
done all that; it fucking sucks! I tell all my friends;
those ads, right? the cooler that shit looks the more it
fucking sucks ass!”
Considering all these dynamics, it seems that failure
is, in fact, America’s only option. And when the full
history of this bloody circus is written, people will
look back slack-jawed at the scale and brazenness of the
occupation’s corruption and incompetence.
BY CHRISTIAN PARENTI
PHOTOGRAPHS BY TERU KUWAYAMA
The New Press, New York,
November 2005
$14.95 PB; 208 pp.
ISBN: 1-56584-948-5
[Excerpts.
Magnificent Conclusion. Highly recommended. T]
The trucks move out in slow,
orderly stages, then make a high-speed dash under the
cloverleaf and down the dusty stretch of road back to the
safety of FOB Volturno, where the only risks are occasional
mortar rounds.
During Operation Dozer’s
after-action report the issues discussed are all tactical.
Alpha Company’s commander, the very serious and bespectacled
Captain Caliguire, runs down the list of what worked and
what didn’t.
Absent from the discussion is
the issue of wining hearts and minds. “On that front,”
explains Caliguire later, “we do our best. We treat people
with respect and dignity but you can’t win them all.
Security comes first. Do people resent the house searches?
Yes. But my job is to bring security to Falluja and keep my
men safe. And there’s not gonna be any reconstruction or
NGOs or UN in here if there isn’t security first.”
Relaxing on his cot, Lt. Bacik
makes similar points. “I do what I am told. If they want me
to build a bridge, I’ll do it. But right now we have to
suppress this resistance. We fight with restraint and
discipline and concern for civilians, but this is a war.”
In short,
the 82nd is focusing on what seems to work best: ”search and
attack.” That means arresting and killing the underground
and its supporters. The methods in this fight are cordon
search operations, undercover Special Forces, local spies
and information extracted from detainees, who, by the
Pentagon’s own admission, are subject to effective
psychological torture such as isolation and prolonged sleep
deprivation.
Using whatever intelligence it
can get, the 82nd launches continuous lightning raids in and
out of Falluja. As for the delicate task of winning the
people’s loyalty; that will have to be someone else’s job;
someone who can provide work, fix the electricity; clean up
the garbage and get Iraq’s oil flowing. In the meantime,
the war in Falluja is far from over.
What do the troops think of
all this?
Bacik, a West Point grad,
twenty-five, and very good at what he does, stays on
message, stays positive, and is circumspect about his
doubts.
Lt. Lipscombe, who I meet
first at a big operational briefing and then later when his
platoon from Delta Company is holding down some streets in
Falluja, is immediately more candid:
“I am not sure I want to stay
in the military. I’ve got a little baby I haven’t seen.”
But opting to not re-enlist (one of the main ways
disaffection with the war is expressed) is a no-no in the
culture of the professional military.
The career
NCOs cajole, then threaten and ridicule and emotionally
ice-out soldiers who don’t sign re-enlistment papers.
Doc Pacheco
is getting a taste of the re-enlistment pressure. The
grunts call this campaign of harassment “getting the panther
penis” because they are part of Task Force Panther;
sometimes it’s just called “the 82 inches.”
Pacheco is a valuable asset:
muscled, tough, fit, he’s a combat medic with advanced
skills, and at the young age of twenty-three he could be
good for at least a decade more of jumping out of airplanes,
shooting at bad guys and clamping shut ripped-open arteries.
But Pocheco doesn’t want to be a career soldier; he joined
the military as a way to become a Chicago firefighter.
“The best
way to get into the department is as an EMT. But those
classes are really expensive. If you join the army they pay
for it.” Pocheco has done his time, which included cleaning
up the brains of a friend who was shot in a accidental
discharge in Afghanistan. Pacheco wants out.
“When they
try to get you to re-enlist, they always say, ‘What are you
gonna do out there? You’ll be sucking dick for beer money.’
“That’s one
of the first sergeant’s favorite lines,” says Pacheco,
sitting on the edge of his cot and jiggling his legs
nervously. His bunkmates joke grimly about the military and
how they are trying to screw Pacheco. But the doc, fresh
from a hot trip to Falluja, wears the _expression of a hurt
boy.
“I think I
did my part. I never wanted to stay in the military my whole
life. I think they should accept that and stop fucking with
me.”
Along
with the glares and verbal abuse from the NCOs, the
Green Machine’s faceless bureaucracy is also pushing
“the panther penis” by losing Pacheco’s pay records,
deleting his accumulated vacation time and making the
ensuing appeal process a nightmare of red tape.
Other soldiers seem less
affected by the pressure. Ryan Martin, the water polo
player, is oblivious to the pressure. Like many guys in
this company Martin also served in Afghanistan.
“Those
recruiting posters? Man, the cooler that shit looks the
more it sucks!” says Martin.
As he rails away, a meek
lieutenant from the mortar platoon walks by, Bible in hand,
headed to Sunday chapel, pretending not to hear the rant.
“Crawling
through swamps. Sleeping in the mud, putting paint on your
face, all that Special Forces shit? I’ve done all that; it
fucking sucks! I tell all my friends; those ads, right? the
cooler that shit looks the more it fucking sucks ass!”
One of Ryan’s buddies is
Joseph Wood, the company armorer and a roommate of Doc
Pacheco.
He’s boyishly handsome, with a
mother from Venezuela, the land of beauty queens, while his
father is a dissolute, downwardly mobile southern
aristocrat. Above his bunk hang Tibetan prayer flags, he
burns incense, wears flip-flops around, and reads books
about spirituality. He served in Afghanistan, jumping out
of choppers and pulling security for teams of Special Forces
operatives.
Now he wants to move to New
York and design women’s clothing. He already has a
stunningly crafted portfolio. So single-minded is Wood in
his quest for an art education and a career that the army’s
re-enlistment pressures are irrelevant to him.
“Man, the army is for fucking
zombies, people who can’t think for themselves.” And he’s
antiwar, but in a weird, frontline combat sort of way.
“I don’t
think we should be here; it’s all about oil. But I am not a
pacifist. Anyone fucks with us, we’ll light ‘em up. They
gotta understand that.” At another time he tells me: “The
army sucks, but I am not saying people shouldn’t join. I
mean, the army can be cool; it’s about defending our
freedoms. Know what I mean?”
**********************************************
Abu G:
“There are fathers in there
with their sons who are as young as thirteen. There are
lots of teenagers,” says Muhammad.
“At one
point our family got a lawyer, but he just took our money
and left. There is no law here. Even 90 percent of the
soldiers say they know you are innocent but they can do
nothing to let you go.
“It is very bad, there is not
enough food, not enough water and many people are sick
inside. During Eid, at the end of Ramadan, we had a big
demonstration in some of the camps. We shouted Allahu
Akbar!’ Some people threw stones and the soldiers started
shooting. I heard that they injured twenty people, but I
only saw one man shot in the hand.”
During the interview we try to
be inconspicuous, crouching on the gravel behind a berm and
some blast barriers. Muhammad says that he saw three
different demonstrations by prisoners during his detention.
The
protests in response to bad conditions were met with more
abuse. “The soldiers do very bad things. They step on the
food to make it dirty.” He and other men who are standing
nearby tell stories of frequent psychological torture,
mostly sleep deprivation, lack of adequate food, limited
water, and widespread illness and bureaucratic chaos.
“There is no process, no
lawyers. They just put you in a tent and forget about you.”
I ask about
Sunni/Shia relations. “There is no division. We are all
united.
“We are all
Muslims and we all hate the Americans.”
At this point another former
detainee joins in. His name is Haji Sabor, and he shows me
some discharge papers with a serial number. He says he was
in Camp Six inside Abu Ghraib.
With Akeel
translating, he says, “Look, I have a message for George
Bush. Tell him he is an asshole. But also, I thank George
Bush because now we are all brothers; Shia and Sunni
together.”
What does
he think should be done? “Solution?” says Haji Sabor.
“They take mothers away from their little children. This is
an affront to Islam. They are awful. There is no solution,
there is no formal way out of this, there is only al-jihad!”
I check
with Akeel as to what exactly Sabor means by this. “He
means jihad. Holy war, not just struggle in the path of
God,” explains Akeel with a look that says, Silly
journalist, what do you think is going on here?
Jihad is not the answer one
usually gets in Iraq.
“They smashed everything in my
house because I was a member of the Baath Party,” says one
man. “They capture lots of students, they are afraid of the
Iraqi students,” says another.
One man
calmly pushes closer while the others are getting riled up
and talking with each other. “Write this down: They shot a
man in the chest. His name was Mazan Thuwany Daud, number
152615. He was shot in the chest and they took him away. I
do not know if he lived. I am not lying. Write it down.”
Our little throng isn’t so
little or quiet any more and has attracted the attention of
some MPs in a Humvee. They pull up on the other side of the
wire-topped berm.
One of the
MPs gets out and swaggers up and down, his helmet and body
armor stiffening his gait, a huge unlit cigar jammed in the
side of his mouth, hatred radiating through his wraparound
mirrored shades. He is such a cliché that I recall feeling
disappointment and thinking, “Too bad no one will actually
believe how ridiculous this guy is when I try to describe
him.”
***********************************
“We had one guy lose his
mind. He started crying and begging to lie down.” When
asked how the prisoners were fed and given water, Mejia
stares off into space for a minute. Then he says, “I don’t
remember how we fed them.”
This soft-spoken young man has
plenty of other bad stories as well. There’s the time his
squad killed a civilian who ran a checkpoint, and the time
they shot a demonstrator.
There’s the
officer who forged orders so he could get his unit into
combat, and the other officer who broke his own ankle to get
out of combat.
There is
the father who wasn’t allowed temporary leave even though
his young daughter had been raped.
Or there’s the story of the GI
who took shrapnel in the head and now can’t talk, can’t take
care of himself, can’t recognize his family, and wakes up in
the middle of the night confused and sobbing.
****************************************************
In every
guerrilla war where lack of real reform has lost the battle
for hearts and minds, that is, where corruption has fatally
undermined attempts to co-opt the insurgency, the government
or occupation forces have had to escalate their use of
violence.
If the
proverbial carrot is consumed by the maggots of graft,
nepotism and theft, then all that remains is the stick.
In that
case, separating the “fish” of the guerrilla from the “sea”
of the people must become a matter of bombardment, crop
destruction, depopulation, forced resettlement and torture.
From the
American plains of the 1870s to the Philippines of the early
1900s to the Cold War era conflicts in Vietnam, El Salvador,
Guatemala and Colombia, military terror against civilian
populations has been the central feature of American
counterinsurgency.
In El
Salvador and Vietnam the countryside belonged to the
guerrillas while the cities were government controlled.
In Iraq the insurgency has its bases or rather lives and
operates) in the cities.
Can
Falluja, Baquba. Najaf or Baghdad’s al-Thawra be treated
like the countryside of Vietnam, “drained” of
population? Russia has applied such a strategy to
Grozny, but the war there goes on.
Urban
massacres in Iraq by American troops would massively
undermine the already tattered political legitimacy of the
United States on the world stage.
In short,
the US is trapped in a political maze where no path leads to
victory.
Considering
all these dynamics, it seems that failure is, in fact,
America’s only option.
And when
the full history of this bloody circus is written, people
will look back slack-jawed at the scale and brazenness of
the occupation’s corruption and incompetence.
History
will record Halliburton’s colossal greed; the Bush
administration’s reckless ideological delusions; Paul
Bremer’s capricious mismanagement; the venality and
duplicity of Chalabi, Allawi and the other disobedient,
incompetent puppets.
And this
criminal farce will be visually branded, linked to images of
bombed mosques in Falluja, the burning Baghdad library with
idle US troops watching, sexual torture and humiliation in
Abu Ghraib, and to the swollen skulls of children sick from
radiation poisoning.
************************************************
March 15,
2004, starts with a chilly gray morning. Camilo is going to
turn himself in to the military.
I drive
from New York to the Peace Abbey in Sherborn, Massachusetts,
where he will hold a press conference and then surrender.
Camilo has
hooked up with two activist groups, Citizen Soldier and
Military Families Speak Out. Their organizing efforts have
brought the press out in force.
At the abbey Camilo is wearing
a medallion that has lacquered into it a bit of cloth
stained by the blood of the slain Salvadoran Archbishop
Oscar Romero. “This is to give me strength,” he says as he
shows me the talisman.
The questions from the press
are insipid but the coverage is good; worldwide.
In
Nicaragua thousands march in Camilo’s honor.
The moment when Camilo is
cuffed and taken away at the gate of Hanscom Air Force Base
west of Boston is awful: the state bares its teeth and
swallows my friend.
In the end
Camilo is court-martialed at Fort Stewart in Georgia and
sentenced to a year in prison.
But Camilo
bears it like the soldier he is.
And in so
doing he points the way forward, he connects all the pieces:
personal trauma, moral responsibility, and a critique of
American empire.
Like a
soldier, he takes action and makes sacrifices in the
interest of others.
And like
all soldiers he will pay a dear price, but this time his
fight is just and worth the cost.
OCCUPATION
REPORT
Good News For The Iraqi Resistance!!
U.S.
Occupation Commands’ Stupid Tactics Recruit Even More
Fighters To Kill U.S. Troops

Iraqi women and children wait
as foreign troops from the 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit
(MEU) search their home in the village of Abu Rayat February
4, 2006. REUTERS/Bob Strong
"In the
States, if police burst into your house, kicking down
doors and swearing at you, you would call your lawyer
and file a lawsuit," said Wood, 42, from Iowa, who did
not accompany Halladay's Charlie Company, from his
battalion, on Thursday's raid. "Here, there are no
lawyers. Their resources are limited, so they plant
IEDs (improvised explosive devices) instead."
What do you think?
Comments from service men and women, and veterans, are
especially welcome. Send to
thomasfbarton@earthlink.net. Name, I.D., withheld on
request. Replies confidential.
OCCUPATION
HAITI
Haitians
Rebel Against Vote Fraud:
Take
Control Of Streets, Build Barricades
14 February 2006 By Manuel
Roig-Franzia, The Washington Post [Excerpts]
Port-au-Prince, Haiti: Haiti's hopes for a peaceful
presidential election exploded Monday in a torrent of
violence as mobs [translation: rightly pissed off citizens
protesting an attempt to steal their election] overturned
cars, set piles of tires ablaze and built elaborate
roadblocks across major highways, protesting delays in the
vote count and alleged fraud in last Tuesday's balloting.
Demonstrators paralyzed cities across the country, from
Cap-Haitien in the north to this impoverished seaside
capital, where tens of thousands of people took to the
streets to demand that Rene Preval, a former president and
favorite of this city's poor, be named president.
In
Port-au-Prince, at least one protester was killed, a luxury
hotel [where the vote stealing thieves were headquartered]
was occupied by demonstrators and the international airport
was closed.
Preval had
urged calm in recent days, but he had also stoked emotions
among followers by accusing Haiti's electoral commission of
lowering his vote total to force him into a runoff and by
mockingly singing, "They're stealing our votes," on his
porch.
Transportation between cities almost completely stopped with
more than 100 roadblocks on main roads between Cap-Haitien
and Port-au-Prince.
Thousands
of Haitians walked for hours along this nation's pitted
highways. Others idled at roadblocks, arguing politics and
trying vainly to squeeze their pickup trucks or cars past
the barriers.
Some of the
roadblocks were marvels of rapid-fire construction, with
stacked stones and looping chains. In other places,
protesters dragged the rusted frames of buses and trucks
into the roadways, piled logs or set fire to old tires.
The chaos
flourished in the almost total absence of law enforcement
[translation: pro-occupation cops loyal to the rich] except
for selected areas of the capital.
Smoke was already rising above
the mountains before dawn Monday near Preval's home in
Marmelade, where he had been monitoring the vote count for
almost a week.
At a
crossroads less than an hour's drive from Preval's home,
a lanky teenager named Pierre Jacky thrust his fist into
the air as another pile of tires went up in flames.
"They are plotting to keep Preval from being president,"
Jacky said of Haiti's electoral commission. "We are
going to show the world that we are behind our
president."
Preval,
who was president from 1996 to 2001 and came out of
quiet retirement to run for his old job, has an
overwhelming lead in the presidential race. But his
advantage has shrunk each day since partial results were
first announced on Thursday, dipping from 61 percent to
48 percent.
If that last figure holds,
Preval will be forced into a risky runoff, in which he could
face a coalition of opposition groups.
Violence is also feared
because of the increasingly tense mood since the election in
Port-au-Prince's huge slums, where Preval is popular.
A
member of Haiti's electoral commission said this week
that he suspected the commission of manipulating the
vote totals to prevent a first-round victory for Preval.
Suspicions have been raised because of a huge number of
invalidated votes, topping 7 percent of all votes cast,
according to partial results.
At a
roadblock outside Gonaives, the thugs [translation: the
citizens standing up for their rights] weren't budging, but
a Haitian driver displayed a photo on his cell phone of him
next to Preval.
A cheer
went up. And the roadblock disappeared. [How very
unthuglike.]
DANGER:
POLITICIANS AT WORK
50% Of
Public Rejects Police State Tactics
12 February 2006 By Nat
Hentoff, The Village Voice [Excerpt]
The rising
present anger around the country, across party lines, is
reflected in a February 3 Zogby Interactive poll that "finds
Americans largely unwilling to surrender civil liberties,
even if it is to prevent terrorists from carrying out
attacks. . . . Even routine security measures, like random
searches of bags, purses, and other packages, were opposed
by half (50 percent) of respondents in the survey. . . .
Just 28 percent are willing to allow their telephone
conversations to be monitored."
On the other hand, nearly half
(45 percent) favored at least "a great deal" of government
secrecy in the war on terror.
But the
public's awareness that the United States has increasingly
become a nation under surveillance is indicated by
resistance not only to random searches and tapping into our
telephone conversations. Zogby says: This is a "public
obsessed with civil liberties."

[Thanks to David Honish, Veterans For Peace, who sent this
in.]
The Idiot
Gonzales Says George Washington Used Electronic Surveillance
More Than Bush
14 February 2006 By William
Rivers Pitt, Truthout Perspective [Excerpt]
Another famous member of the
Washington Wack-Pack is Attorney General Alberto Gonzales.
Gonzales, testifying before the Senate Judiciary
Committee regarding warrantless wiretapping of American
citizens authorized by Mr. Bush, said, "President
Washington, President Lincoln, President Wilson,
President Roosevelt have all authorized electronic
surveillance on a far broader scale."