GI Special:

thomasfbarton@earthlink.net

3.29.06

Print it out: color best.  Pass it on.

 

GI SPECIAL 4C26:

 

 

Iraq Veterans Against The War

Photographed by Shirley H. Young, Veterans For Peace at the wreckage of a miniature golf course in Mississippi, March 16, 2006

 

 

ENDGAME:

Colossal Command Stupidity Turns Even Shia Collaborators Against The Occupation:

“We Are Ready To Resist The Americans And Strike Their Bases”

“The US Is Now Caught Up In A Growing Confrontation With Iraq's 15 Million Shias”

 

28 March 2006 Patrick Cockburn in Arbil, Independent News and Media Limited & (AP) & Richard Boudreaux and Zainab Hussein, L.A. Times & By KIRK SEMPLE, NY Times

 

The killing of what the Americans say were 16 "insurgents", and what Shias claim were 37 unarmed worshippers in the Mustafa mosque, may turn out to be a turning point in the three-year-old Iraq crisis.

 

Iraq's Shias, 60 per cent of the population, have hitherto largely co-operated with American occupation while Sunni Arabs have resisted.  But the Shias increasingly see the US as trying to deny them power despite the electoral success of its Alliance.

 

Critics of the killings at the mosque included the most powerful members of the Iraqi government.

 

"Entering the Mustafa Shia mosque and killing worshippers was unjustified and a horrible violation from my point of view," Bayan Jabr, the Interior Minister, told Al-Arabiya television. "Innocent people inside the mosque offering prayer at sunset were killed."

 

The US is now caught up in a growing confrontation with Iraq's 15 million Shias.

 

The governor of Baghdad, Hussein Tah-an, said the city's provincial council had cut ties to the US military and diplomatic mission, "because of the cowardly attack on the al-Mustafa mosque".

 

The local police said shots had been fired at a joint US-Iraqi patrol but not from the mosque. They confirmed the claim by Shia leaders that all the dead, whom they estimated to number 22, were in the complex for evening prayers and none were gunmen.

 

The US-Iraqi special forces were patrolling an area loyal to Muqtada al-Sadr, the nationalist cleric, who has a huge following. 

 

 

The Shias were already suspicious of US efforts to force them to accept a national unity government whose composition goes against the election results.  The US, UK and the Gulf Arab states want Iraq's government to include Iyad Allawi in a powerful position although he only won 25 out of the 275 seats in parliament.

 

The US now faces the prospect of hostility from the Shia, the community from which most of the Iraqi army and police are recruited.

 

The Baghdad governor said he cut ties with U.S. forces and diplomats. 

 

And all 37 members of the Baghdad provincial council suspended cooperation with the United States in reconstruction projects planned for the remainder of the year, as well as political and security coordination, said council chairman Moeen al-Khadimi.

 

There were 18 dead, all males, three in their 60s and one in his teens.

 

At least 13, including a guard, were identified as members of Dawa, the party of Prime Minister Ibrahim Jafari.

 

"My shop was full of people trying to escape the shooting," said Sayaid Thamir, a 50-year-old merchant who works across the street from the mosque.  "Soldiers were shooting randomly everywhere.  Cars were not allowed to move."

 

"What happened was terrifying," he said.  "If they were looking for terrorists, why couldn't they do it quietly?"

 

No gunfire came from the mosque, several witnesses said.

 

"The Americans started the raid without giving us a chance to negotiate or to find out what they wanted," Sheik Safa Timimi, the imam of the mosque, said in an interview Monday on Iraqi radio.  "Some young men tried to approach them but were shot at."

 

"The government must find out the truth about these special units of the Iraqi army that function outside government control and perpetuate massacres with the support of the U.S. Army," said the statement by the Alliance, the Shiite coalition that leads the interim government.

 

Anti-American sentiment stirred up by the killings filled the airwaves of Al Iraqiya, the state-run television network, and other broadcast media for a second day Monday.

 

It spilled into the working-class streets of Ur as seven pickup trucks and other vehicles bore 16 wooden coffins in a slow cortege, followed by hundreds of mourners on foot. Residents said two other bodies had been sent away earlier for burial.

 

"No, no to America!" chanted a man identified only as Sheik Jalel, standing in the back of the lead truck.  "No, no to the devil!  No, no to Israel!"

 

The procession and its police escort wound past the crumbling white walls of the mosque compound, which bore banners denouncing the attack.

 

People spilled out of nearby shops and modest homes to march with the coffins.  Others watched and wept from behind iron gates.

 

Neighbors of the mosque said Sadr's militia did not show up and confront the U.S. and Iraqi forces, dismissing early reports of a clash.

 

Mahdi fighters brandishing weapons took to the streets in Ur and Sadr City in a show of force and warned they were prepared to attack American troops. 

 

Many accompanied a solemn and tense funeral cortege for the victims through the streets of Ur.

 

But Shiite leaders, including Mr. Sadr, urged calm.

 

"We are ready to resist the Americans and strike their bases," vowed Katheer Abdul-Ridha, 22, a member of the Mahdi Army, who was guarding a roadblock in Sadr City.

 

"The Sunnis have nothing to do with this, and we shouldn't accuse them of everything that's going on."

 

 

IRAQ WAR REPORTS

 

 

BAGHDAD SOLDIER KILLED BY SMALL-ARMS FIRE

 

3/28/2006 HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES CENTRAL COMMAND NEWS RELEASE Number: 06-03-02C

 

BAGHDAD:  A Multi-National Division Baghdad Soldier was killed by small-arms fire at approximately 4 p.m. March 28 south of Baghdad.

 

SOLDIER KILLED, THREE WOUNDED BY HABBANIYAH IED

 

3/28/2006 HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES CENTRAL COMMAND NEWS RELEASE Number:

 

BAGHDAD, Iraq:  One U.S. Soldier was killed and three were wounded when their Humvee was struck by an improvised explosive device outside Habbaniyah March 28.

 

Marine Injured For Third Time While Serving In Iraq

 

3.28.06 By JEFFREY CUNNINGHAM, Advance Newspapers

 

A Ravenna man was injured in a recent truck explosion in Iraq the third time he has been injured while serving there.

 

U.S. Marine Cpl. Jared Smith suffered second-degree burns on his face about three weeks ago when the seven-ton vehicle he was driving hit an improvised explosive device.

 

He is the son of Duane and Becky Smith, of Ravenna, and a 2003 graduate of Calvary Christian High School in Fruitport.

 

According to his mother, Smith was driving a seven-ton transport vehicle and carrying at least 10 men in the back of the truck when the rear axle hit the IED and caused the explosion. "We received a call from a sergeant who is stationed in Camp Pendleton in California the day after the incident who told us about Jared's injuries," Becky Smith said last week.

 

Smith reportedly returned to his unit a few days after the incident, his mother said. He was able to call his family a few days after the incident and assured them that he was all right. "Apparently he has second-degree burns on his face and he has no eyebrows, but he said he was fine," she said.

 

"My heart was so much lighter after he called. I'm not worried about him because I know that he is in the Lord's hands."

 

This is not the first time that Smith has been injured since he was deployed to Iraq last September, his mother said.

 

"In October, he was in a truck convoy and the truck that was two behind his truck hit and IED and exploded," she said. Smith reportedly lost his hearing for nearly two weeks from the explosion. His hearing returned and he was able to return to his unit.

 

On Dec. 10, the fuel truck he was driving rolled as he tried to avoid a hole in the roadway.  "Apparently the fuel in the tank shifted and the truck rolled and caught fire," Mrs. Smith said.  "He was thrown off the truck's gun turret and as he was thrown out, he apparently got wrapped in the turret's rubber protector.  The report said that when he hit the ground 15 feet away, he bounced."

 

Smith reportedly saw that the truck was on fire and ran back to the truck.  He was able to pull another crewman from the vehicle and reportedly saved the crewman's life by his actions.  "He lost the tip of right ring finger and chipped a tooth," his mother said.  "He spent more than a month in the hospital and had just returned to his unit when the last incident happened."

 

Smith said that her son is scheduled to return from Iraq by the end of April.  Last week his company headed to Kuwait and left the war in Iraq behind.

 

"He'll be home for a two-week leave sometime in May, we hope, and then we aren't sure what will happen next."

 

His unit is scheduled to return to Iraq in September, she said, but his hitch is up in February so he doesn't know at this time if he will return to Iraq with his unit or not.

 

 

TROOP NEWS

 

 

THIS IS HOW BUSH BRINGS THE TROOPS HOME:

BRING THEM ALL HOME NOW, ALIVE

The flag draped coffin of Lance Corporal Holly Charette of the U.S. Marine Corps as Charette was buried at the Rhode Island Veterans Cemetery in Exeter, Rhode Island July 2, 2005. Corporal Charette was killed in Fallujah, Iraq when her convoy was attacked in June 2005.  REUTERS/Brian Snyder

 

“There's A Lot Of Stuff That You Pick Up From Being With The Soldiers That The Military Would Hate You To Have Out There On Air”

 

March 26, 2006 CNN RELIABLE SOURCES, HOWARD KURTZ, HOST INTERVIEWING CBS's Laura Logan: [Excerpt]

 

CBS's Laura Logan:

 

And I really -- the soldiers ask about it, but I think that, you know, the smarter ones realize that journalists report what they see.  And we're very, very fair.

 

And there's a lot of stuff that you pick up from being with the soldiers that the military would hate you to have out there on air.

 

And if you're, you know, if you're smart enough and you can put in it your context, you realize that may be the view of an individual soldier who is tired of being here after six months, and so you don't put it out there.

 

Major General (Ret’d) Says Rumsfeld

“Has Shown Himself Incompetent Strategically, Operationally And Tactically”

 

March 19, 2006 By PAUL D. EATON, The New York Times Company. Paul D. Eaton, a retired Army major general, was in charge of training the Iraqi military from 2003 to 2004.  [Excerpts]

 

DURING World War II, American soldiers en route to Britain before D-Day were given a pamphlet on how to behave while awaiting the invasion.  The most important quote in it was this: "It is impolite to criticize your host; it is militarily stupid to criticize your allies."

 

By that rule, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld is not competent to lead our armed forces.  First, his failure to build coalitions with our allies from what he dismissively called "old Europe" has imposed far greater demands and risks on our soldiers in Iraq than necessary.

 

Second, he alienated his allies in our own military, ignoring the advice of seasoned officers and denying subordinates any chance for input.

 

 

In the five years Mr. Rumsfeld has presided over the Pentagon, I have seen a climate of groupthink become dominant and a growing reluctance by experienced military men and civilians to challenge the notions of the senior leadership.

 

I thought we had a glimmer of hope last November when Gen. Peter Pace, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, faced off with Mr. Rumsfeld on the question of how our soldiers should react if they witnessed illegal treatment of prisoners by Iraqi authorities. (General Pace's view was that our soldiers should intervene, while Mr. Rumsfeld's position was that they should simply report the incident to superiors.)

 

Unfortunately, the general subsequently backed down and supported the secretary's call to have the rules clarified, giving the impression that our senior man in uniform is just as intimidated by Secretary Rumsfeld as was his predecessor, Gen. Richard Myers.

 

Mr. Rumsfeld has put the Pentagon at the mercy of his ego, his cold warrior's view of the world and his unrealistic confidence in technology to replace manpower.  As a result, the Army finds itself severely undermanned — cut to 10 active divisions but asked by the administration to support a foreign policy that requires at least 12 or 14.

 

Only Gen. Eric Shinseki, the Army chief of staff when President Bush was elected, had the courage to challenge the downsizing plans.  So Mr. Rumsfeld retaliated by naming General Shinseki's successor more than a year before his scheduled retirement, effectively undercutting his authority.

 

The rest of the senior brass got the message, and nobody has complained since.

 

Mr. Rumsfeld has also failed in terms of operations in Iraq.  He rejected the so-called Powell Doctrine of overwhelming force and sent just enough tech-enhanced troops to complete what we called Phase III of the war — ground combat against the uniformed Iraqis.  He ignored competent advisers like Gen. Anthony Zinni and others who predicted that the Iraqi Army and security forces might melt away after the state apparatus self-destructed, leading to chaos.

 

It is all too clear that General Shinseki was right: several hundred thousand men would have made a big difference then, as we began Phase IV, or country reconstruction. There was never a question that we would make quick work of the Iraqi Army.

 

The true professional always looks to the "What's next?" phase.  Unfortunately, the supreme commander, Gen. Tommy Franks, either didn't heed that rule or succumbed to Secretary Rumsfeld's bullying.  We won't know which until some bright historian writes the true story of Mr. Rumsfeld and the generals he took to war, an Iraq version of the Vietnam War classic "Dereliction of Duty" by H. R. McMaster.

 

Last, you don't expect a secretary of defense to be criticized for tactical ineptness. Normally, tactics are the domain of the soldier on the ground.  But in this case we all felt what L. Paul Bremer, the former viceroy in Iraq, has called the "8,000-mile screwdriver" reaching from the Pentagon.

 

Commanders in the field had their discretionary financing for things like rebuilding hospitals and providing police uniforms randomly cut; money to pay Iraqi construction firms to build barracks was withheld; contracts we made for purchasing military equipment for the new Iraqi Army were rewritten back in Washington.

 

Donald Rumsfeld demands more than loyalty.  He wants fealty.

 

And he has hired men who give it.

 

Consider the new secretary of the Army, Francis Harvey, who when faced with the compelling need to increase the service's size has refused to do so.  He is instead relying on the shell game of hiring civilians to do jobs that had previously been done by soldiers, and thus keeping the force strength static on paper.  This tactic may help for a bit, but it will likely fall apart in the next budget cycle, with those positions swiftly eliminated.

 

So, what to do?

 

First, President Bush should accept the offer to resign that Mr. Rumsfeld says he has tendered more than once, and hire a man who will listen to and support the magnificent soldiers on the ground.

 

More vital in the longer term, Congress must assert itself.

 

Too much power has shifted to the executive branch, not just in terms of waging war but also in planning the military of the future.  

 

Our most important, and sometimes most severe, judges are our subordinates.  That is a fact I discovered early in my military career.  It is, unfortunately, a lesson Donald Rumsfeld seems incapable of learning.

 

 

 

Wonderful News!!

All Troops Can Now Leave Iraq:

Rumsfeld’s Criteria For Victory All Met!!!

 

March 27, 2006 By Al Kamen, Washington Post

 

President Bush's comment last week that U.S. troops would be in Iraq three more years provoked some consternation.  

 

Bush had always said the troops would be there until "the job is done and not a day longer," but few assumed that the troops would remain through his presidency.

 

Actually, Bush is being way too pessimistic.

 

On April 9, 2003, three weeks after the invasion of Iraq, Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld clearly set out the 10 objectives to be achieved "before victory can be declared."

 

 -- "Baghdad is in the process of being liberated" and the Hussein regime must be run out of there and other cities, he said. CHECK -- been run out of just about everywhere at least once.

 

 -- "We still must capture [or] account for Saddam Hussein and his sons and the senior Iraqi leadership." CHECK.

 

 -- "We still must find and ensure the safe return of prisoners of war in this war as well as any still held from the last Gulf War." CHECK -- save for one missing soldier.

 

 -- "We still must secure the northern oil fields." CHECK -- although the pipelines keep getting hit.

 

 -- "We still need to find and secure Iraq's weapons of mass destruction facilities...." CHECK -- they are tightly secured.

 

 -- "...and secure Iraq's borders so we can prevent the flow of weapons of mass destruction materials and senior regime officials out of the country." CHECK -- no outward flow.

 

 -- "We need to locate Iraqi scientists with knowledge of these programs." CHECK.

 

 -- "We must also capture or kill the terrorists still operating in Iraq and prevent them from gaining access to weapons of mass destruction." CHECK -- at least for those there in '03 and none are getting access to that WMD.

 

 -- "We must locate Baath Party members, records and weapons caches," records of elite intelligence and military units and regime millions outside the country. CHECK.

 

 -- "And we must begin the process of working with free Iraqis ... and those returning home from exile, to establish an Iraqi interim authority and help to pave the way for a new Iraqi government." CHECK -- done that several times now.

 

Candidate In Illinois Congressional Race Running Under The “Bring Our Troops Home” Party Name.

 

From: Tom Condit tomcondit@igc.org

Sent: March 28, 2006

Subject: Peace candidate in Illinois congressional race

 

Bill Scheurer for Congress

8th District - Illinois

www.BringOurTroopsHome.com

 

Fellow Citizen,

 

Help us put the Iraq War on the 2006 ballot.  We're almost there!  Only $15,000 more!

 

Bill Scheurer is running for Congress under the "Bring Our Troops Home" party name.

 

The "Bring Our Troops Home" party name will appear with 25,000 petition signatures this spring, on 270,000 ballots this fall, and in millions of Chicago newspapers before the election.

 

You can help in 2 easy ways:

 

1) Contribute from $1 to $2100 to this campaign.

 

2) Forward this email to everyone you know who opposes the Iraq War, and ask them to keep forwarding it to others.

 

The Republican and Democratic candidates both support the war, so the choice is clear.

 

Voters will have a mandate -- right here in the heartland -- to bring our troops home, and take care of them when they get here.

 

Please visit our www.BringOurTroopsHome.com website to contribute and to learn more.

 

Thank you,

 

Citizens for Bill Scheurer

387 Northgate Rd

Lindenhurst, IL 60046-8541

www.BringOurTroopsHome.com

 

 

IRAQ RESISTANCE ROUNDUP

 

 

Assorted Resistance Action

 

Mar 28, 2006 (AP) & News World Communications & (KUNA)

 

Police exchanged fire with two attackers outside a police station south of Baghdad.  Eleven police and a female bystander were wounded.  A series of mortar rounds then hit the police station, but nobody was harmed.

 

A police source explained that a bomb placed by the governorate headquarters in Kirkuk resulted in injuring four policemen.  And another roadside bomb targeting a police patrol exploded in Kirkuk, wounding five policemen.

 

Six other policemen were also wounded by a bomb targeting their patrol 20 kilometers (12 miles) west of Kirkuk, with three of them listed in critical condition.

 

Two policemen were injured when a similar bomb went off against their patrol near the northern town of Samarra, police said.

 

In other attacks around Baghdad a member of the interior ministry's public order brigade was injured by gunfire in the southern Dura district.

 

On Monday night an Iraqi intelligence agent was shot by gunmen in the southern Risala neighborhood, security sources said.

 

11 policemen were wounded when gunmen attacked a police station on the main road between Iskandariya and Latifiya.

 

In another development, a physician confessed to killing no less than 35 Iraqi policemen and soldiers with lethal injections and other means as they were treated in one of Kirkuk's hospitals.

 

The confessions of the physician, Dr. Luay Omar Al-Tae, were broadcast by a Kurdish television station.

 

Al-Tae explained that the persons he killed were suffering minor injuries, adding that he used to also cutoff electricity from operation rooms and reopening wounds.

 

An intelligence official from the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) said Al-Tae's cover was blown by a terrorist who was apprehended by security forces, noting that Al-Tae's crimes were first brought up by Britain's The Independent newspaper.

 

Al-Tae, added the official, was driven to commit these crimes by "hate for Americans."

 

Al-Tae, who received USD 100 after each killing, was responsible killing Kirkuk's deputy police director, General Ajman Abdullah, through lethal injection.

 

 

 

FORWARD OBSERVATIONS

 

 

A Man’s Word:

“My Husband Has Now Served 8 Months In Jail, Apparently Because The Commanders Of The Us Military Are Not Bound By The Oaths They Take”

 

[www.geocities.com]g]

 

From: Monica Benderman

To: GI Special

Sent: March 28, 2006

 

March 27, 2006 By Monica Benderman. 

 

 

When a soldier no longer wants to fight, when his conscience tells him that he can no longer believe in the mission and commanders order that soldier back to combat against his will, there is something wrong.   There is something very wrong when commanders send that soldier to jail simply because they cannot control what he believes, and what he believes scares them.  

 

In Afghanistan, we are witnessing a tragic violation of basic human rights – rights given to all people simply for being alive.   A man has made a choice – a personal choice – and he is being threatened with death because of his choice. 

 

Our government officials have stepped in and offered their thoughts on how the Afghan government should proceed in their treatment of this man.

 

 Members of our administration have publicly stated that freedom of religion is a personal choice, one afforded all human beings; the man should be set free and allowed to practice his religion as he chooses. 

 

This is the same administration that allowed my husband to go to jail for making a choice – a personal, moral choice based on his ethical beliefs. 

 

My husband, Sgt. Kevin Benderman, chose to no longer participate in war. 

 

He followed the Army regulations, filed a Conscientious Objector application, and acted honorably every step of the way.   

 

His unit commanders chose to punish him for not allowing them to control him with their threats, and my husband went to jail simply because his commanders had no integrity, no honor and no respect for the very constitution they had given a sworn oath to uphold.

 

Sadly, the military administration has sided with my husband’s commanders to this point.  At any time, any member of the military hierarchy could have stepped in and ordered the command to abide by the regulations.  Instead, the military powers that be chose to turn a deaf ear to the truth and the facts, and allow the continued mistreatment of one of their own – a veteran who has served with distinction for ten years. 

 

The sworn testimony given verbatim in the Record of Trial from my husband’s court martial, clearly shows an incompetent command; a command that lied, mishandled their administration of my husband’s request, and fabricated evidence after the fact.   It shows a command that had no knowledge of the regulations, no idea how to respond to my husband’s request and admittedly made no effort to learn.

 

The company commander stated for the record that “Sgt. Benderman is just one soldier out of 191 that I command.  I did not have time to worry about him.”   

 

He went on to admit that he “was not aware of the proper procedures for handling Sgt. Benderman’s request, but if he had been he would have taken steps to correct his actions.”

 

On five separate occasions, the Command Sgt. Major of the battalion gave sworn testimony regarding a meeting he requested with my husband to discuss his Conscientious Objector application.   These sworn testimonies contradicted each other with regard to several of the facts that, had the truth been told, would have exonerated my husband before there ever was a court martial. 

 

 

 

My husband has now served 8 months in jail, apparently because the commanders of the US military are not bound by the oaths they take. 

 

The commanders of the US military have a choice – they can abide by their personal integrity and lead by following the rules, or they can make up the rules as they go along -- so much for integrity.

 

 

For ten years, Sgt. Kevin Benderman served the Army of this United States with honor and integrity.  He received nothing but commendations and outstanding evaluations, and not one derogatory counseling statement. 

 

Kevin went to Iraq and performed his duties with the same integrity and honor that he gave to all aspects of his service. 

 

After firsthand experience, knowing that he could no longer participate in war, recognizing it as “the greatest form of man’s inhumanity to man” he prepared to leave the military when his enlistment expired.  The US Army refused to let him go peacefully and issued him a stop/loss order. 

 

Following regulations, and staying true to himself and his beliefs, Kevin submitted a Conscientious Objector application in spite of a Company chaplain who would rather “debate” Kevin than assist him in his legal request and a Company commander who believed that threats, intimidation and character attacks would convince my husband to bend to his will. 

 

The actions of the command make a statement loud and clear.  It is not the statement they would like us to believe however. 

 

While their public statements mentioned that the sentencing of my husband was meant to “show other members of the military that they could not use Conscientious Objection as a way to avoid service in Iraq,” their actions show nothing more than cowardice in the face of moral courage and personal integrity; two character traits sorely lacking in many of the commanders my husband has been forced to serve with for the past 3 years. 

 

When called to hold themselves accountable to the oaths they took, these men failed miserably. 

 

At a time when leadership at all levels is sorely needed these men showed clearly why this country is in the mess we’re in. 

 

The RULES are there for a reason, and an oath taken is one that is meant to be kept unless the party to whom the oath is given has broken their word. 

 

Perhaps that is the problem in a nutshell. 

 

The oath that is taken relies on the integrity of an individual to keep his word. 

 

For the commanders in the military to understand the meaning of keeping their word, they would require an example in those who lead them. 

 

Every member of the military and our government has taken an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. 

 

My husband went to jail because he refused to compromise on the oath he took, nor on his personal principles,  and continues to defend the right to freely choose how he will live. 

 

Integrity: the true measure of a man is in the word he keeps.

 

“The Attempt To ‘Humiliate’ The Iraqi People Has Failed”

 

From: C

To: vice_president@whitehouse.gov;

Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 6:46 PM

Subject: humility?

 

Dear richard cheney,

 

Having humility isn't that bad of a thing but, humility is a condition of the heart. Since humility forms in the heart, it is something that each individual must choose from within him or herself.

 

Of course, people can influence each other but, when it comes right down to the end result of how we perceive life, God has given each one of us a distinct uniqueness.

 

Oppressors may succeed in stifling some forms of human _expression; however, no one can force true virtues on anyone else.

 

That is why criminal justice focuses first on stopping crime; and that is why the attempt to "humiliate" the Iraqi people has failed.

 

http://www.thememoryhole.org/war/iraqis_tortured/

 

Your policies are not "humiliating".  They are torture.  

 

You are embarrassing our nation and you will stop.

 

Living the rights of our constitution;

C

 

P.S. - Thanks for getting right on those questions I sent you in my last e-mail; even though I haven't got any real response back yet. Your form letter was great though. I appreciated it.

 

I would also like to point out that I intentionally did not capitalize your name in this letter because, I do not respect you.

 

The Bush Traitors Got What They Came For

 

27 March 2006 By William Rivers Pitt, Truthout Perspective [Excerpt]

 

I am going to find a china shop somewhere in the city and walk in with a free-swinging baseball bat. My goal, which will be clearly stated, will be to improve upon the place. I will spend the next three years meticulously destroying everything I see inside, from the cash registers to the display cases to the nice Royal Albert tea sets in the corner.

 

Along the way, I will batter the brains out of any poor sod unfortunate enough to get in my way. When I am done, I will claim with as much self-righteousness as I can muster that none of the mess is my responsibility.  I will then, of course, refuse to leave.

 

Hey, if the president can do it, it must be legal, right?

 

Unfortunately, the difference between my china shop analogy and what the Bush administration is doing in Iraq is that I won't get anything out of it except an arrest record and a chance to enjoy my state's municipal accommodations.

 

Bush and crew are reaping far better benefits from the mayhem they have caused.

 

Here's the deal, in case anyone is wondering: none of this, not one bit of it, can be or should be chalked up to "incompetence" on the part of Bush or anyone else within his administration.

 

This was not a mishandled situation.  Bush and the boys have gotten exactly, precisely what they wanted out of Iraq, and are now looking forward to fobbing it off on the next poor dupe who staggers into the Oval Office. 

 

They got what they came for, and have quit.

 

Consider the facts. For two elections in a row, 2002 and 2004, the GOP was able to successfully demagogue the rafters off the roof about supporting the troops and being patriotic, placing anyone who questioned the merits of the invasion squarely into the category of "traitor."

 

Meanwhile, military contractors with umbilical ties to the administration have cashed in to the tune of hundreds of billions of dollars.

 

The same goes for the petroleum industries; did you know there are gas lines today in oil-rich Iraq?  It's true.  The oil infrastructure is fine; indeed, it is the most well-guarded point of pressure in Iraq.

 

There are gas lines because companies like Halliburton are not pumping the oil.  They are sitting on it, keeping it as a nice little nest egg.

 

One would think this administration would be worried about the violence and chaos in Iraq.  They aren't, because the violence has become the justification for "staying the course."

 

Bush will mouth platitudes about bring democracy to the region, but that is merely the billboard.  What he and his friends from the Project for the New American Century wanted in the first place, and what they have now, is a permanent military presence over there.

 

There was never any consideration of a timetable for withdrawal, because there was never any intention to withdraw.

 

The violence today is a self-perpetuating justification, a perfect circle lubricated by blood, oil and currency.

 

 

 

 

OCCUPATION REPORT

 

 

2003: SOWING THE WIND

2006: REAPING THE WHIRLWIND

A US soldier keeps guard as a bulldozer razes to ground one of several houses in Ramadi suspected of insurgent activity.  June 3, 2003. (AP Photo/Saurabh Das)

 

[Fair is fair.  Let’s bring 150,000 Iraqis over here to the USA.  They can kill people at checkpoints, tear down their houses without hesitation, overthrow the government, put a new one in office they like better and call it “sovereign,” and “detain” anybody who doesn’t like it in some prison without any charges being filed against them, or any trial.]

 

[Those Iraqis are sure a bunch of backward primitives.  They actually resent this help, have the absurd notion that it’s bad their country is occupied by a foreign military dictatorship, and consider it their patriotic duty to fight and kill the soldiers sent to grab their country.  What a bunch of silly people.  How fortunate they are to live under a military dictatorship run by George Bush.  Why, how could anybody not love that?  You’d want that in your home town, right?]

 

 

 

So Much For That “Sovereignty” Bullshit:

Collaborator Army Recruits “Screened By U.S. Officials”

 

March 28, 2006 AP

 

RAMADI, Iraq: Beyond the army recruiting center’s maze of blast walls and barbed wire, a roadside bomb targeted an Iraqi Humvee.  From a rooftop across the street, a gunman popped up and took aim, drawing a brief hail of return fire.

 

In the building next door, a mortar round crashed through the roof.

 

Nobody ever said recruiting for the Iraqi army would be easy.  And by the end of the first army recruiting drive in this insurgent-infested [translation: resistance liberated] city Monday, just 31 young men had stepped through the door to join up.

 

The low turnout highlights the difficulty of filling the army’s ranks in Ramadi, where Sunni residents both distrust the Shiite-dominated Iraqi military already deployed here and fear joining up will mark them as insurgent targets.

 

“For a place like Ramadi, we’re doing well to have any recruits at all,” said U.S. Marine Capt. Selden Hale, a recruiting adviser. “But it’s a start, and it’s progress, whether it’s one (recruit) or 1,000.”

 

Aware of the issue and keen to spread the word, U.S. officials said some 400 “invitation cards” to join the army were sent out for distribution to tribal sheiks, government officials and Iraqi army units.

 

Nobody showed up with the cards.

 

 

“I wouldn’t trust any of these guys,” said Mohamed, a Shiite, gesturing toward the line of half a dozen Sunni recruits among the 31 allowed to enter.

 

Two people who stopped by were suspected of trying to gather intelligence about the glass factory for insurgents.  Both were detained, blindfolded, questioned and released.

 

Monday’s would-be recruits were screened by U.S. officials and given literacy tests. American soldiers took down their identities and conducted iris scans to determine whether they had been detained before.

 

Leading Collaborator Calls Condi Rice A Liar

 

March 27, 2006 Juan Cole, juancole.com

 

Abdul Aziz al-Hakim, the Iraqi Shiite cleric who heads the largest bloc in the elected parliament, denied Sunday that Iran is directly intervening in Iraq.

 

He said that no proof has ever been presented of these allegations.  It doesn't help Condi Rice to make her case when a close US ally like al-Hakim directly contradicts her.

 

 

DANGER: POLITICIANS AT WORK

 

 

 

“Remember The Dead”

“Resist The War”

Anti-war protester being arrested for civil disobedience in front of the White House on September 26, 2005. 

 

By then, 1,900 American soldiers had been killed, and untold thousands of Iraqi citizens had perished.

 

In Vietnam, the U.S. government was obsessed with a body count.

 

In Iraq, the U.S. military will keep that a well guarded secret.

 

Mike Hastie

Vietnam Veteran

 

 

 

Imperial Democrats And Imperial Republicans Agree:

Keep The War In Iraq Going;

Only 71 Vote No

 

March 27, 2006 Jeff Leys, www.commondreams.org/views06/0327-28.htm

 

Once again, Congress is poised to approve "emergency" funding to prosecute the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.  The House already approved $67.5 billion on March 16, 2006-rushing the bill through the Appropriations Committee and the House floor in order to get home in time for St. Patrick's Day.

 

This time around, 71 Representatives voted against the "emergency" spending.

 

FBI Clowns Target Vegetarian Food Bank, Indymedia, And Anarchist Group That Didn’t Exist As “Terrorist” Threats

 

[Thanks to PB, who sent this in.]

 

March 27, 2006 By Nicholas Riccardi, L.A. Times Staff Writer [Excerpts]

 

The FBI, while waging a highly publicized war against terrorism, has spent resources gathering information on antiwar and environmental protesters and on activists who feed vegetarian meals to the homeless, the agency's internal memos show.

 

The murky connection that the federal government makes between some left-wing activist groups and terrorism was illustrated in a Justice Department presentation to a college law class this month.

 

An FBI counterterrorism official showed the class, at the University of Texas in Austin, 35 slides listing militia, neo-Nazi and Islamist groups. Senior Special Agent Charles Rasner said one slide, labeled "Anarchism," was a federal analyst's list of groups that people intent on terrorism might associate with.

 

The list included Food Not Bombs, which mainly serves vegetarian food to homeless people, and - with a question mark next to it - Indymedia, a collective that publishes what it calls radical journalism online.  Both groups are among the numerous organizations affiliated with anarchists and anti-globalization protests, where there has been some violence.